Listening In, In Vague War Reporting https://www.johndayblog.com/2022/12/vague-war-reporting.html Colonel Douglas Macgregor (US Army ret.) spoke about the need to replace the Washington "courtiers" in the "court of the American empire". This statement came at the end of an hour of giving the specific problems within this globalist elite class, who have grown up without comprehending the interests of the American people.
I don’t often agree with Kissinger and this is among the few times. With the potential of a worst case scenario it’s wise to negotiate and recognize that Russian Allie’s come into play along with Ukrainian allies which then increases risk of escalation. Talk early and often with bilateral concessions and compromises and respect the inhabitants will and best interests. Do we really need more war?! Politics cloud everything and we should learn from history. Wilson from 1916 can teach Biden in 2022.
John, I just finished watching Tulsi and Tucker. While I was watching I was thinking to myself, I should let John Day know about this. It was so much better than I was expecting. And resonated with my views in so many ways. Then I went to check my email and the notification for this blog was at the top of my Inbox. Either I've been following your blog for way too long or great minds think alike. I'm going to go with the latter. Best wishes for happy holidays and keep up the good fight. With gratitude and appreciation, Bob H.
There's been all kinds of information about the JFK assassination, the conspiracies involved etc, all over the internet for years. It's not found in one place and pieces need to be fitted together from disparate sources. However, because they do not have stamp of officialdom to them, apparently that makes them 'theories' rather than the truth which as we all know the Deep State is so keen to record in all its official documentation.
I would say that officially documenting the truth about JFK within the CIA is extremely unlikely from those seeking to uphold the Deep State. Information will have been closely guarded, passed on verbally to only a small number of highly compromised insiders and death threats having been issued to anyone who thought of spreading such information further.
What is always easiest to do is to debunk 'official theories' due to the presence of contradictory evidence of such magnitude as to render such theories quite obviously false. That doesn't make knowing what the truth is any easier.
It's obviously impossible for Oswald to have been a lone shooter, since Kennedy's body was pierced by more than one bullet and they came from totally different directions. No theory that stands up can have less than two shooters, unless weaponry only recently in the public consciousness (namely control of weaponry through remote electronics) actually existed in the 1960s, which most people are pretty certain is not the case.
The evidence is clear that Kennedy's body was tampered with between initial pronouncement of death in Dallas and arrival in Maryland. Evidence for that came from senior doctors of the period. You don't fake evidence for no good reason, it's very expensive to maintain lies. So perception management was in full flow in the first hours after the shootings.
The evidence is in that the biggest political beneficiary of the assassination was the Vice President and that the biggest policy change was that concerning war in Vietnam. That doesn't mean anything more than those with interests to promote/protect in those arenas should be on long lists of potential co-conspirators.
The evidence is in that JFK caught the CIA trying to organise illegal coups in Cuba and that the CIA never forgave him for that. The CIA had multiple reasons to want to get rid of a troublesome meddling President and are an organisation with almost unique competences in the field of military assassinations. The organisation had both capability and motive. And the Dulles brothers were hardly squeamish when it came to crushing foreign aspirations interfering with US corporate interests.
The evidence is in that in case after case, the Establishment has known the answer before any evidence has been gathered. They have primed the media channels and those channels have been unquestioning prostitutes to the official message. That's no coincidence, when it spans the years 1963 to 2001 in terms of killing people and up to 2020 when you look at crashing global economies and imposing false vaccinations on billions. Its what you call a modus operandum. It works, so they use it again and again.
It's not hard to draw conclusions as to who the most likely conspiracy participants could be, but proving that they actually did it is something else entirely.
But what can be in no doubt is that Lee Harvey Oswald did not plan to kill a President alone and it is high time that every US Citizen grew up learning that.
I don’t often agree with Kissinger and this is among the few times. With the potential of a worst case scenario it’s wise to negotiate and recognize that Russian Allie’s come into play along with Ukrainian allies which then increases risk of escalation. Talk early and often with bilateral concessions and compromises and respect the inhabitants will and best interests. Do we really need more war?! Politics cloud everything and we should learn from history. Wilson from 1916 can teach Biden in 2022.
John, I just finished watching Tulsi and Tucker. While I was watching I was thinking to myself, I should let John Day know about this. It was so much better than I was expecting. And resonated with my views in so many ways. Then I went to check my email and the notification for this blog was at the top of my Inbox. Either I've been following your blog for way too long or great minds think alike. I'm going to go with the latter. Best wishes for happy holidays and keep up the good fight. With gratitude and appreciation, Bob H.
Thats a tall order Dr. John. Would you like that with or without fries?
There's been all kinds of information about the JFK assassination, the conspiracies involved etc, all over the internet for years. It's not found in one place and pieces need to be fitted together from disparate sources. However, because they do not have stamp of officialdom to them, apparently that makes them 'theories' rather than the truth which as we all know the Deep State is so keen to record in all its official documentation.
I would say that officially documenting the truth about JFK within the CIA is extremely unlikely from those seeking to uphold the Deep State. Information will have been closely guarded, passed on verbally to only a small number of highly compromised insiders and death threats having been issued to anyone who thought of spreading such information further.
What is always easiest to do is to debunk 'official theories' due to the presence of contradictory evidence of such magnitude as to render such theories quite obviously false. That doesn't make knowing what the truth is any easier.
It's obviously impossible for Oswald to have been a lone shooter, since Kennedy's body was pierced by more than one bullet and they came from totally different directions. No theory that stands up can have less than two shooters, unless weaponry only recently in the public consciousness (namely control of weaponry through remote electronics) actually existed in the 1960s, which most people are pretty certain is not the case.
The evidence is clear that Kennedy's body was tampered with between initial pronouncement of death in Dallas and arrival in Maryland. Evidence for that came from senior doctors of the period. You don't fake evidence for no good reason, it's very expensive to maintain lies. So perception management was in full flow in the first hours after the shootings.
The evidence is in that the biggest political beneficiary of the assassination was the Vice President and that the biggest policy change was that concerning war in Vietnam. That doesn't mean anything more than those with interests to promote/protect in those arenas should be on long lists of potential co-conspirators.
The evidence is in that JFK caught the CIA trying to organise illegal coups in Cuba and that the CIA never forgave him for that. The CIA had multiple reasons to want to get rid of a troublesome meddling President and are an organisation with almost unique competences in the field of military assassinations. The organisation had both capability and motive. And the Dulles brothers were hardly squeamish when it came to crushing foreign aspirations interfering with US corporate interests.
The evidence is in that in case after case, the Establishment has known the answer before any evidence has been gathered. They have primed the media channels and those channels have been unquestioning prostitutes to the official message. That's no coincidence, when it spans the years 1963 to 2001 in terms of killing people and up to 2020 when you look at crashing global economies and imposing false vaccinations on billions. Its what you call a modus operandum. It works, so they use it again and again.
It's not hard to draw conclusions as to who the most likely conspiracy participants could be, but proving that they actually did it is something else entirely.
But what can be in no doubt is that Lee Harvey Oswald did not plan to kill a President alone and it is high time that every US Citizen grew up learning that.