Seems more than a little naive. Putin is playing a part, he (and Russia) are central to WEF’s 4IR. Your assertions on Tulsi are wishful thinking. She is a graduate and affiliate with other “penetrate ze cabinets” global leaders. Speaking of looking at her actions, they’re awful apart from making a big show of leaving the democrat caucus. If she wanted to make a difference she would expose the corruption and racketeering of the WEF, but instead she has dodged addressing it at all.
It seems like Tulsi visited with the WEF, but did not participate, was not cut out of that cloth, was already an Army reserve officer, and had already served in a war zone.
She went to talk to Assad, while a Congresswoman from Hawaii.
She was pilloried for that.
She has always advocated for peace, because she knows war.
She has had 2 full tours of duty in war zones.
She is a Lieutenant Colonel in a medical unit, US Army Reserve.
What makes you think all WEF-aligned figures are pro-war? I’ve seen nothing from Tulsi that contradicts their goals, and you are downplaying her connection. She graduated from the young global leaders program c/o 2015. Leaving aside many problematic policy positions, what it boils down to is that’s a huge disqualification until it is addressed satisfactorily. To me and others she should be treated as compromised until proven otherwise.
You choose what you think; how you approach trust. I don't choose that for you.
I became aware of Tulsi Gabbard politically in 2010, when I was working in Hawaii, and have followed her closely since then. That does not transfer to other people.
We all have to observe, test and consider in life.
2. BDS is boycott, divestment and sanctions, which is an approach to pressure the apartheid-state of Israel to change policies towards the colonized Palestinian people.
I don't know her current stance on that, nor her prior stance.
1. I am also puzzled about the entire Russian approach to COVID-"vaccines" which has been fractured and adversarial. Putin supported choice, and got-the-shots, but the Moscow Mayor pushed a mandate. Untrusting Russians have had a low uptake of the "products". I think all of the WEF stuff looks worse than it looked 2 years ago to politicians.
3. "Heroine" (pronouns: she, her, hers > chuckle)
Tulsi Gabbard being elected could only happen after or during a transition between power-elites.
Those elites are fractured, making the US "not agreement capable".
The "rationalist" elites, who see that the "unipolar world" is over, and the US has to be a nation-among-nations, would support Gabbard (if anybody).
The VP slot is the insurance policy for the power elites (JFK >> LBJ, for instance).
Tulsi Gabbard in that slot, and Trump or DeSantis in POTUS slot would mean a change in power elites, an all-out transition , allying with the American people, which is a rare moment.
Populism usually only enters modern politics in an elite power-struggle.
The people need to be paid when they are deputized to fight in elite power struggles.
A new social-contract has to be entered, like the "New Deal".
All good points; I most strongly concur w/point 3 -- the change we (all life on Earth) so desperately need, if we hope to survive as a species, cannot happen from the top down. I got deeply involved in national electoral politics in 2000; what a wake-up call. That system is entirely rigged and cannot be hacked.
(*an aside: JOHN ! it was FANTASTIC!!! to watch you on Meryl Nass's CHDTV morning show today!!! WONDERFUL INTERVIEW!!! Great to see you in real live presentation! Super awesome and perfect match that Meryl Nass ending up being a kindred spirit buddy to you!! Huge smile on my face the whole time of this beautiful communing of beautiful hoomans!! hahaha, Big hug, )
Tulsi is the cleanest dirty shirt in the closet. She is articulate, a veteran, a political person and a Hinduvata supporter of longstanding. She could be a pivot away from China. Of course the primary problem is the Executive Branch is not where key decisions are made in this peculiar polity. She can be elected Captain on the ship of fools but the ship has taken on water and is sinking. Cynic I may be but she if awarded the prize in 2024 gets the pleasure of going down with the ship or ensuring elites get the lifeboat. No non-binary possible after Biden.
The collapse and bottoming, the capitulation and negotiated power-transfer of elite factions has to happen after the new Congress is seated for there to be any chance of an upswing in 2024. It is sort of a long-shot, but Tulsi-for-VP 2024 would be a sign that the power-transfer had been arranged.
Real executives are absolutely necessary in times of rapid and fundamental change.
The current elites cannot allow any such thing. They must capitulate.
Force. Unflinching brutality Mafia dons respect only brute force. Chechnya is a Russian ally due to brute force. Tacitus commented on the Pax Romana which more or less is the Pax Americana. Internally as well as externally factions respect force only. Votes are icing on the baked cake of blood.
We touched on the idea before about who is alive to vote after injections. If a large number of Americans are sick and dead after 2022 going into 2024 this has to effect politics. If the Federal government continues to enforce and encourage and demand injections no matter the outcome this may provoke secession.
Each state government chose it's own path under the sign of Covid. All but 6 caved in. History shows that tyrannical factions refuse to abdicate unless they lose so badly the only chance for survival is a phony peace. Tulsi has her agenda. I have no idea truthfully what this will be. I can see her aspiring to be the deal maker between the armed factions ready to play Samson. I just have too much faith in the prevalence of the "dead hand of the past" to think politics is other than how to divide the spoils and keep control of power that ensured the most choice spoils go to the best connected. This moment in human history has no precedent. The ambition of one world state - a Terran Soviet - has a political party of many names but in shorthand the Globalist party. Globalism lacks two things - a defeat of existing Superpowers (ala WW1) and Lenin.
I essentially agree with your outlook on force being necessary to change things, but also the loss of the ability to extract resources weakens an elite faction and they may negotiate to live.
What will be extracted with the global $US debt default is the energy/wealth to employ a military and other goons to exact tribute.
The actual military must mostly see this, and many others, especially US-based businesses.
The one-world-state cannot exist because the cost of that level of hierarchy is too great to sustain in a world of declining energy and resources, declining real wealth.
Each layer of complexity adds cost to a system.
Systems tend to collapse down to whatever layer of complexity is stable under prevailing conditions.
What might that be with internet & grid? What about without internet & grid?
Not global. (The globalists are more Trotskyist than anything.)
We are global now Informal global agreement to inject all that lives or is it a formal agreement? A collapsed Russia created the USSR. A collapsed international state system can create a New Global Soviet with legitimation arising from "Nie Wieder Krieg," especially if atomics are used in Europe. All the treaties exist. The UN exists. Heck we go back to Kant when speaking of global governance. And energy is there depending on scale. Atomic energy is available. I take a long view suggesting everything since WW1 has taken us to the point of no return. Some kind of Global order is going to play cop. And this order will mine asteroids, Luna, maybe Mars over the next 100 years and this is why Transhumanism is being pushed so hard. Injecting people with graphene oxide is a huge experiment in biology. Enquiring minds want to know. WEF badly wants to know.
The electronic hierarchy of internet nodes all managed by the owners creates an appeal for global control, but the cost is that it destroys local problem solving, which kills the real economy.
We shall see. This is a massive real-time, real-world model being run.
Kills a kind of global economy but does not kill a village economy. My opinion is the die off continues until probably less than 500 million globally remain human born of human. And even this number is picked out from Georgia Guidestones. I write speculative fiction on the side having read quite a bit until 30. Even so my imagination has blockage envisioning 20 years out from November.
Economic and military regime-change is in the winds, already visibly underway.
Tulsi is taking shots at the MIC and specifically spoke of Bobby Kennedy's peace stance (why they killed him) as a reason she originally joined the Democratic Party.
Things do change about every 80 years.
It's coming around again.
Realistically, Tulsi would be Republican VP candidate.
This would signal an actual power-elite-transition, because the VP is the power-elite insurance-policy (JFK >> LBJ). If Tulsi is on the ticket as VP it means that the Bush/Clinton/CIA/FBI/NSA cabal is out-of-power.
I agree that seems fantastic, and it may not happen.
Gabbard, DeSantis and Trump might all die of cancer before then.
FDR was a power-elite regime change in the US. The British Empire fell to FDR, but then felled-FDR and took his seat (according to Joe Stalin, and it is rational).
The NATO commanders are meeting now, yesterday and today. I doubt they can "prevail" over Russia. Stoltenberg said they "lose" if Russia "wins".
The $US financial regime will collapse and be in the process of replacement by BRICS+ global trade regime. That's the end of funding for the empire.
You may quite rationally disagree, and it may go down very differently.
I currently see the DAVOS parasites as being weakened and somewhat outed, not nearly as much of a threat.
Also... I disagree about BRICS. China is a disaster economically. And it's not going to get better there soon. Without a strong China, there's no successful BRICS. And I think that the extremely devious assholes that created this world around economic 'game' are not going to let the USA crash. I think they'll cause other countries to crater economically instead. My 2 cents...
I agree that there is a lot of rot in China. The economy is a jet turbine with fuel clogs and other problems, which needs to keep spinning.
China is also a massive production center, with a vast, competent workforce, that needs work, like BRI, and also needs a lot of outside resources. They have stockpiled for war, but clearly know their own vulnerabilities.
China cannot go-it-alone, but remains a truly powerful ally in an alliance.
The US and Russia have the most resources and industry as stand-alones, with Russia in the lead, unlike 20 years ago.
"Let the USA crash" is an undefined term, starting to be defined.
Stay tuned...
The western global financial regime must change.
Trust is low. When the $US is not trusted the world will demand gold and commodities, real stuff, BRICS+ stuff (I think).
Thanks for your reply. I don't see how any of what you mentioned supports your claim of: 'Economic and Military regime-change is in the winds, already visible underway.' I see the Ukraine war as an opportunity to bring Putin to his knees. And I think this will happen. The manipulations of central banks are seemingly well on the way to crashing the global economy. Why ? Probably so that hugely wealthy enterprises, like Blackrock & the Vanguard Group can buy up devastated assets at pennies on the dollar. Crickets anyone ? They are now a recommended protein food source by the WEF. And a lot more. But still, individuals can choose to create bulwarks against this. Don't count out hardy individuals and the moves they are making and will make.
All that is valid, and the debt-deflation-asset-grab, like the Asian Economic Crisis, is part of a plan, which I think will fail this time, since there will be a get-out-of-jail/debt-free card in BRICS+ trade-arrangements.
It's an existential war. One side will "win"; the other side will LOSE.
I don't count out hardy individuals. I seek to emulate that archetype.
Why doesn’t anyone ever ask Tulsi about her background in the WEF young global leaders program?
Everybody talks about her brief engagement with those folks in 2015, but it didn't take.
She was not the droid they were looking for, just as Vlad-the-lad was not that droid.
Look at what she says and does, and how she has conducted her life.
She says stuff that Davos and the MIC don't want to be said.
She walks the walk, too.
Seems more than a little naive. Putin is playing a part, he (and Russia) are central to WEF’s 4IR. Your assertions on Tulsi are wishful thinking. She is a graduate and affiliate with other “penetrate ze cabinets” global leaders. Speaking of looking at her actions, they’re awful apart from making a big show of leaving the democrat caucus. If she wanted to make a difference she would expose the corruption and racketeering of the WEF, but instead she has dodged addressing it at all.
It seems like Tulsi visited with the WEF, but did not participate, was not cut out of that cloth, was already an Army reserve officer, and had already served in a war zone.
She went to talk to Assad, while a Congresswoman from Hawaii.
She was pilloried for that.
She has always advocated for peace, because she knows war.
She has had 2 full tours of duty in war zones.
She is a Lieutenant Colonel in a medical unit, US Army Reserve.
What makes you think all WEF-aligned figures are pro-war? I’ve seen nothing from Tulsi that contradicts their goals, and you are downplaying her connection. She graduated from the young global leaders program c/o 2015. Leaving aside many problematic policy positions, what it boils down to is that’s a huge disqualification until it is addressed satisfactorily. To me and others she should be treated as compromised until proven otherwise.
You choose what you think; how you approach trust. I don't choose that for you.
I became aware of Tulsi Gabbard politically in 2010, when I was working in Hawaii, and have followed her closely since then. That does not transfer to other people.
We all have to observe, test and consider in life.
Thanks for considering my view.
1. Putin pushed covid1984 from the beginning, and the Russian government pushed QR codes on their people, Russians are resisting though.
2. Last time I checked Tulsi supported Anti BDS laws.
3. If Tulsi is the hero people think she is, she cannot win in the first place.
2. BDS is boycott, divestment and sanctions, which is an approach to pressure the apartheid-state of Israel to change policies towards the colonized Palestinian people.
I don't know her current stance on that, nor her prior stance.
1. I am also puzzled about the entire Russian approach to COVID-"vaccines" which has been fractured and adversarial. Putin supported choice, and got-the-shots, but the Moscow Mayor pushed a mandate. Untrusting Russians have had a low uptake of the "products". I think all of the WEF stuff looks worse than it looked 2 years ago to politicians.
3. "Heroine" (pronouns: she, her, hers > chuckle)
Tulsi Gabbard being elected could only happen after or during a transition between power-elites.
Those elites are fractured, making the US "not agreement capable".
The "rationalist" elites, who see that the "unipolar world" is over, and the US has to be a nation-among-nations, would support Gabbard (if anybody).
The VP slot is the insurance policy for the power elites (JFK >> LBJ, for instance).
Tulsi Gabbard in that slot, and Trump or DeSantis in POTUS slot would mean a change in power elites, an all-out transition , allying with the American people, which is a rare moment.
Populism usually only enters modern politics in an elite power-struggle.
The people need to be paid when they are deputized to fight in elite power struggles.
A new social-contract has to be entered, like the "New Deal".
All good points; I most strongly concur w/point 3 -- the change we (all life on Earth) so desperately need, if we hope to survive as a species, cannot happen from the top down. I got deeply involved in national electoral politics in 2000; what a wake-up call. That system is entirely rigged and cannot be hacked.
(*an aside: JOHN ! it was FANTASTIC!!! to watch you on Meryl Nass's CHDTV morning show today!!! WONDERFUL INTERVIEW!!! Great to see you in real live presentation! Super awesome and perfect match that Meryl Nass ending up being a kindred spirit buddy to you!! Huge smile on my face the whole time of this beautiful communing of beautiful hoomans!! hahaha, Big hug, )
Thank You, Sister.
Tulsi is the cleanest dirty shirt in the closet. She is articulate, a veteran, a political person and a Hinduvata supporter of longstanding. She could be a pivot away from China. Of course the primary problem is the Executive Branch is not where key decisions are made in this peculiar polity. She can be elected Captain on the ship of fools but the ship has taken on water and is sinking. Cynic I may be but she if awarded the prize in 2024 gets the pleasure of going down with the ship or ensuring elites get the lifeboat. No non-binary possible after Biden.
The collapse and bottoming, the capitulation and negotiated power-transfer of elite factions has to happen after the new Congress is seated for there to be any chance of an upswing in 2024. It is sort of a long-shot, but Tulsi-for-VP 2024 would be a sign that the power-transfer had been arranged.
Real executives are absolutely necessary in times of rapid and fundamental change.
The current elites cannot allow any such thing. They must capitulate.
What will that take?
Force. Unflinching brutality Mafia dons respect only brute force. Chechnya is a Russian ally due to brute force. Tacitus commented on the Pax Romana which more or less is the Pax Americana. Internally as well as externally factions respect force only. Votes are icing on the baked cake of blood.
We touched on the idea before about who is alive to vote after injections. If a large number of Americans are sick and dead after 2022 going into 2024 this has to effect politics. If the Federal government continues to enforce and encourage and demand injections no matter the outcome this may provoke secession.
Each state government chose it's own path under the sign of Covid. All but 6 caved in. History shows that tyrannical factions refuse to abdicate unless they lose so badly the only chance for survival is a phony peace. Tulsi has her agenda. I have no idea truthfully what this will be. I can see her aspiring to be the deal maker between the armed factions ready to play Samson. I just have too much faith in the prevalence of the "dead hand of the past" to think politics is other than how to divide the spoils and keep control of power that ensured the most choice spoils go to the best connected. This moment in human history has no precedent. The ambition of one world state - a Terran Soviet - has a political party of many names but in shorthand the Globalist party. Globalism lacks two things - a defeat of existing Superpowers (ala WW1) and Lenin.
I essentially agree with your outlook on force being necessary to change things, but also the loss of the ability to extract resources weakens an elite faction and they may negotiate to live.
What will be extracted with the global $US debt default is the energy/wealth to employ a military and other goons to exact tribute.
The actual military must mostly see this, and many others, especially US-based businesses.
The one-world-state cannot exist because the cost of that level of hierarchy is too great to sustain in a world of declining energy and resources, declining real wealth.
Each layer of complexity adds cost to a system.
Systems tend to collapse down to whatever layer of complexity is stable under prevailing conditions.
What might that be with internet & grid? What about without internet & grid?
Not global. (The globalists are more Trotskyist than anything.)
We are global now Informal global agreement to inject all that lives or is it a formal agreement? A collapsed Russia created the USSR. A collapsed international state system can create a New Global Soviet with legitimation arising from "Nie Wieder Krieg," especially if atomics are used in Europe. All the treaties exist. The UN exists. Heck we go back to Kant when speaking of global governance. And energy is there depending on scale. Atomic energy is available. I take a long view suggesting everything since WW1 has taken us to the point of no return. Some kind of Global order is going to play cop. And this order will mine asteroids, Luna, maybe Mars over the next 100 years and this is why Transhumanism is being pushed so hard. Injecting people with graphene oxide is a huge experiment in biology. Enquiring minds want to know. WEF badly wants to know.
The electronic hierarchy of internet nodes all managed by the owners creates an appeal for global control, but the cost is that it destroys local problem solving, which kills the real economy.
We shall see. This is a massive real-time, real-world model being run.
We are part of he computation network.
Kills a kind of global economy but does not kill a village economy. My opinion is the die off continues until probably less than 500 million globally remain human born of human. And even this number is picked out from Georgia Guidestones. I write speculative fiction on the side having read quite a bit until 30. Even so my imagination has blockage envisioning 20 years out from November.
Man... get real. The political system in then USA is captured by Blackrock and the Vanguard Group.
We are approaching a phase-transition.
Economic and military regime-change is in the winds, already visibly underway.
Tulsi is taking shots at the MIC and specifically spoke of Bobby Kennedy's peace stance (why they killed him) as a reason she originally joined the Democratic Party.
Things do change about every 80 years.
It's coming around again.
Realistically, Tulsi would be Republican VP candidate.
This would signal an actual power-elite-transition, because the VP is the power-elite insurance-policy (JFK >> LBJ). If Tulsi is on the ticket as VP it means that the Bush/Clinton/CIA/FBI/NSA cabal is out-of-power.
I agree that seems fantastic, and it may not happen.
Gabbard, DeSantis and Trump might all die of cancer before then.
If it does happen, that's what it should mean.
Don't agree. 'Economic and Military regime-change is in the winds, already visible underway.' Feel like sharing any examples of this ?
FDR was a power-elite regime change in the US. The British Empire fell to FDR, but then felled-FDR and took his seat (according to Joe Stalin, and it is rational).
The NATO commanders are meeting now, yesterday and today. I doubt they can "prevail" over Russia. Stoltenberg said they "lose" if Russia "wins".
The $US financial regime will collapse and be in the process of replacement by BRICS+ global trade regime. That's the end of funding for the empire.
You may quite rationally disagree, and it may go down very differently.
I currently see the DAVOS parasites as being weakened and somewhat outed, not nearly as much of a threat.
Nationalism will be replacing globalism...
unless I'm wrong, and I can certainly be wrong.
Also... I disagree about BRICS. China is a disaster economically. And it's not going to get better there soon. Without a strong China, there's no successful BRICS. And I think that the extremely devious assholes that created this world around economic 'game' are not going to let the USA crash. I think they'll cause other countries to crater economically instead. My 2 cents...
I agree that there is a lot of rot in China. The economy is a jet turbine with fuel clogs and other problems, which needs to keep spinning.
China is also a massive production center, with a vast, competent workforce, that needs work, like BRI, and also needs a lot of outside resources. They have stockpiled for war, but clearly know their own vulnerabilities.
China cannot go-it-alone, but remains a truly powerful ally in an alliance.
The US and Russia have the most resources and industry as stand-alones, with Russia in the lead, unlike 20 years ago.
"Let the USA crash" is an undefined term, starting to be defined.
Stay tuned...
The western global financial regime must change.
Trust is low. When the $US is not trusted the world will demand gold and commodities, real stuff, BRICS+ stuff (I think).
Thanks for your reply. I don't see how any of what you mentioned supports your claim of: 'Economic and Military regime-change is in the winds, already visible underway.' I see the Ukraine war as an opportunity to bring Putin to his knees. And I think this will happen. The manipulations of central banks are seemingly well on the way to crashing the global economy. Why ? Probably so that hugely wealthy enterprises, like Blackrock & the Vanguard Group can buy up devastated assets at pennies on the dollar. Crickets anyone ? They are now a recommended protein food source by the WEF. And a lot more. But still, individuals can choose to create bulwarks against this. Don't count out hardy individuals and the moves they are making and will make.
All that is valid, and the debt-deflation-asset-grab, like the Asian Economic Crisis, is part of a plan, which I think will fail this time, since there will be a get-out-of-jail/debt-free card in BRICS+ trade-arrangements.
It's an existential war. One side will "win"; the other side will LOSE.
I don't count out hardy individuals. I seek to emulate that archetype.