20 Comments

The binary of Russia vs. Nato in my opinion is fake. It was fake during the Cold War and fake today.

Both power complexes buy into 4th and 5th generation technology. Both complexes were making haste to conform with the WEF. Russia despite being exiled is still quite interested in cooperating. Both power complexes are all in on mass vaccination and QR codes. Russia has a history with the Democrats who saw Hillary make bank by selling 20% of our Uranium to Russia. President Biden is hopelessly compromised by his own actions and his son with China and Ukraine. This dirty little war is speeding globalism with an AI face. Digital currency is next. Are nations sovereign or are the plutocrats buying politicians more so? If the fast road to the Great Reset is war over 404 then Russia gets those resources and the world approves. Russia was quite aware of US biological labs. Russia was until undertaking it's special police action a staunch partner of the USA in some significant areas. I see this more as a way to give China even more power by forcing Russia into her arms. On the other hand, based on Russian defectors it seems possible the baton was passed to China by the Russians prior to Yeltsin. Anatoliy Golitsyn – The Perestroika Deception

The Perestroika Deception is a sequel to Anatoliy Golitsyn’s famous work New Lies for Old, published in 1984, which accurately predicted the preplanned removal of the Berlin Wall, ‘collapsible Communism’ and all the deceptive Leninist strategic events of 1989-91.

Both Golitsyn books expose the Soviet Bolshevik strategy to procure the establishment of World (Communist) Governance. Western participants in this long-range plan collaborated with the Soviets to procure the ‘fall’of the Soviet Union, but failed to understand that they were being double-crossed by the Soviets – who have covertly persisted with their dimension of the World Revolution as though nothing really changed: which it didn’t. There was no true strategic discontinuity in 1989-91 – merely a Leninist (deceptive) discontiniuty to hoodwink the West. https://conspiracyresearch.org/forums/anatoliy-golitsyn-the-perestroika-deception

One of his predictions was Russia and China as "One clenched fist" waging war against the USA.

Lest we forget Klaus Schwab admires Lenin and has a bust of him in his office.

Finally Anthony Sutton wrote a book in 1973 discussing the collaboration.

You may read this book and think the author "dreamed a dream that could not be." For Antony Sutton, research fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, proves that there is no such thing as Soviet technology, only American and allied technology on Soviet soil. Technology that maimed and killed American boys in Korea and Vietnam.

Bridge building to Communist Russia is nothing new. It started early in 1918. With mountains of documentation Mr. Sutton shows that 90 to 95 percent of Soviet technology since 1918 has come from America and its allies . . . that we've built for, or sold, or traded, or given outright to the Communists everything from copper wiring and motor vehicles to combat tanks, missile equipment and computers . . . that we are today giving equipment to build the world 's largest heavy­ truck plant (output: 100,000 ten-ton trucks per year - more than all U.S. manufacturers produce in a year) . . . that "peaceful trade" is a myth . . . that to the Soviets all goods are strategic. All this, to create and maintain an enemy that we annually spend $80 billion to defend against.

National Suicide, researched for over ten years, mentions scores of products passed on to the Soviets (down to the design specifications, in some cases). It fearlessly names the guilty manufacturers and politicians - right up to Presidents of the United States.

The government won't like this book. It blows the lid off information that has been kept from the public till now. But Americans weary of no-win wars and taxpayers repelled at subsidizing our enemy will hail this scholarly, gutsy volume.

National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union Paperback – January 1, 1973

Expand full comment

While I do think it would be a great idea to localize and stop all the global nonsense, which benefits only the very top of the predatory capitalist pyramid, I am baffled by how so many people, who are very well aware that almost everything we hear from the "authorities," for decades, if not centuries, if not thousands of years, are so many LIES, that we should believe ANYTHING they say. Fear mongering and the solutions of less freedom and medical evil are the modus operandi. I think we should stop the knee-jerk panic every time our foul, utterly malignant corporate media tells us yet another bullshit story and then tries to manipulate us into doing some new Stupid Thing.

Yes, localize, bring it all down to our own communities. And that's IT. De-centralization is the ticket, but it must be in combination with IGNORING the red-flag-waving media with the mouthpieces of governmental/bankster/MIC (that's Military AND Medical Industrial Complexes)/corporate LIES.

Expand full comment

Would this not depend on the number alive in 2030? Also politics suppresses inventions from coming to market but does not prevent Oligarchs from having them tested. For instance, it seems feasible based on science work that Cold Fusion may be able to be better understood. https://hackaday.com/2020/09/28/nasa-claims-cold-fusion-without-naming-it/

Expand full comment

Actually, re contraction, the peak oil community 15 years ago or so was offering lots of advice and scenarios. I liked many of the future projections of John Michael Greer of Ecosophia blog. They made sense to me. Also read Dmitry Orlov's book on Reinventing Collapse (was that the title?) I note he has chosen to repatriate in the Russian Federation, but the takeaway from his writing for me was that Russians were much more skilled at dealing w collapse than Americans, who seem to have become a party people, instead of growing up and acting like adults. Maybe now we'll have to.

Expand full comment
May 30, 2022Liked by John Day MD

This is all good but remember, you *see* what you look at. Adapt, create, endure. That is how our obviously robust DNA got this far. Defocus….increase the scope via gaze.

Much potential in the chaos. If you can perceive it. :-)

Expand full comment