Discussion about this post

User's avatar
reante's avatar

What I'm doing is not projecting but characterizing your ideological loyalties. Ideological loyalties are, more often than not, not conscious. So if they're not in your mind then that's not necessarily surprising.

If Meryl is in bed with Bobby then she's a shill for the Illuminati, and presumably subconsciously so, just like Bobby. Moths to the flame of Power: that's all that's required for the Illuminati to herd you into the fluorescent Light of Power if and when the agricultural circumstances call for it.

Your ideas don't all agree with each other because you're ideas don't have a center of gravity. You don't have a unifying theory, just at postmodern fragmentation. Yet you lay claim to these fragments. But there is no building there. Nobody builds with fragments; even the Watts Towers relied on a concrete matrix.

Our job in life is to build. Sustainably.

I do not open my mouth unless I can figure out a way to synthesize new events into my unified theory. If I can't do that then I keep quiet or I modifying the unified theory as necessary. If, ultimately, I can neither synthesize nor modify, then I start all over again from scratch because the theory has become unsustainable. That's all of a Reason -based human life in a nutshell, yet that is not what you nor 99.9pc of the talking heads here are participating in.

That's politics for you. Fumbling and bumbling. You and Ilargi are two peas in a pod now, ideologically. Nevermind the true, independent greatness of the most meritorious men and women like El Gallinazo and Nicole Foss and I.M. Nobody who left The Automatic Earth because of him.

If we're standing still and juggling ideological fragments, like THEY want us to do, then we're not building for ourselves, and so we're falling behind, because their consent factory is ALWAYS building a dynamic narrative with occasional twists and turns such as this one.

If we can't figure out how to build a unified theory, then that is totally okay. That's rarified air. So rarified that most consider it hubristic to even attempt to, nevermind the logical fallacy inherent to that consideration, to say nothing of the psycho-emotional roots of it. If we can't theorize with consistency then we must refuse the hobgoblins of the mind their political desires for a foolish inconsistency.

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

I am totally into the Creator who made all life...and many of those who follow the Koran have not progressed from the teachings, which started 300 years after Mohammad's death back 1400 years ago. . He was illiterate and Mohammad attacked Mecca...wanted to wipe it out! He was not a man of virtue...he had none. The wealthy people who started Islam...promoted the Koran, which they composed. Its always the same thing in every religion...some wealthy people at the top wanting the support of all the little people at the bottom. There are at least 9 chapters in the Koran, which start out...Kill Infidels...all who do not believe in Islam. Is this an uplifting religion or is it.a death cult? There were intelligent leaders in the United states who read the Koran...and tried to stop Islam from being established here in the U.S. There are a number of limited thinkers who are into this cult in our Congress. They need to be outed. In islam, they can not honestly take an oath to any, except ALLAH. They can not take any other oath, but the Koran says that they may lie, if they have to take an oath...in order to support Islam. I have a feeling in the pit of my stomach about the Palestinians...are they in the ream of vipers...mindless snakes, which strike without warning???.

Expand full comment
41 more comments...

No posts