Again, I'm not a supporter of either party and I never have been. Gaza is clearly genocide. However, the democrats have clearly gone insane and deserted middle class Americans and the poor 2 decades ago. Regardless, I just love the exposure of the poisonous creatures and rot falling out of the AID rotten log...
USAID paid Hollywood stars for trips to Ukraine
Sean Pen, Orlando Bloom, Jean-Claude Van Damme and other Hollywood stars publicly stated that they were on the side of the Ukrainians in the conflict with Russia and even traveled to Kyiv. But not for nothing, but for round sums. Van Dam received $1,500,000, Ben Stiller $4,000,000, Sean Penn $5,000,000, Orlando Bloom $8,000,000. Angelina Jolie was the most expensive - she was paid as much as $20,000,000.
The Democratic party dynamic (and hence the post-GFC neoliberalism in general) of the last couple decades was just how the Hidden Hand of the global Elites had to manage the socioeconomics in order to stave off collapse from the global peak in conventional oil production. It had to be one political party or the other, and the liberal party was the more natural fit, obviously, since political conservatism is self-limiting.
You are most welcome, Steve. Your days are getting notably longer now. I'm sure you can appreciate that. Ireland is lovely and green in the summer. We bike toured the Burren as a family in 2005.
"Russia is sitting on 70%, already, thwarting globalist "owners""
Why would you imply that Trump is doing the globalists' bidding here regarding Ukrainian rare earth resources when you clearly believe that Trump is opposed to the globalists because, in no small part no doubt, the globalists are tirelessly trying (and failing, apparently) to kill him? Makes no sense, to say nothing of the fact that the globalists also own Russian lock stock and barrel.
Well Trump obviously knows that Russia is sitting on 70pc if you know that Russia is sitting on 70pc... so who else's bidding, if not the globalists', could he be doing if he wants to wrest them from Russia.
You think he's doing his own bidding? That this is a three-way grudge match between Russia, the globalists, and the superman Donald J Trump (plus his 4 man crew of cosplaying avengers)?
I think Trump, like FDR, deals with a lot of other oligarchs, that there is a lot of negotiation, and that their desires are not unified in this time of rapid change.
Trump is throwing out propositions which may be useful in negotiations.
Of course the mines can't be wrested from Russia, as they have been made part of Russia, but the "ownership" of them remains negotiable, and that "ownership" is collateral for leveraged loans, and so on.
The articles often have a more nationalistic perspective, but I think banking/finance explains motives better for these assets.
It really looks like Russian-US cooperation on a lot of things would be good for Russia, the US and Europe, but financiers want things to go according to their schemes.
Yet the private financiers finance everything that everybody on the planet does, includingbthe DEW program that can disintegrate swaths of America with impunity but somehow can't kill Trump.. All public new money 'oligarchs' are front oligarchs of private finance. Their wealth is in central banknotes. As I've said a million times, you invert the structuralism of the situation and put the financiers below the new money 'oligarchs,' which is also what both PBS and Fox News does.
It's like thinking the towers were brought down by men with box cutters.
I agree, and have explored in excerpted articles here, that the development of supranational finance (Venice, etc.) enabled bigger wars and debt-servitude of nations, and should be cut at the roots.
We approach a system-wide crash/reset. "Ownership" by supranational finance is the root, at which to strike.
Some have clearer views of that. I think Trump and Musk do, but where will they go in the collapse?
If you agree, then, then that agreement capability needs to also be agreement capable of the finer details of that agreement: if you strike at the root of the tree of civilization then you destroy civilization altogether; as you well know, it is impossible to fell a mature tree in order to separate it from its roots, and then graft that stumpless treetop onto the next stump over. The leaves of the tree photosynthesize but there can be no tree without roots to feed it.
The only way to adapt the system to collapse is for the system itself to adapt. The treetop cannot turn on its roots. It doesn't know how and it doesn't have a chainsaw and a sawyer to hire. This is not cartoonland.
Ben, may I invite you to entertain the thought that since Jack Kennedy departed this life, every single POTUS has been reading from a script, just giving a performance. It wouldn't surprise me at all to discover that the so called "leaders" of China and Russia haven't had sight of the script and been given walk on parts in what is shaping up to be the end of Western civilization.
The folks running the show have known since the '50s that easy, cheap oil would be gone within 60years with the result being the theatrical production we are all now being treated to.
From the antics of 9/11 to Trump's ear having a close encounter with a bullet, all pure pantomime to anyone with well developed critical thinking skills.
It's shaping up to be the end of the whole of industrial civilization, Paul, both East and West.
Non-public-originated but (publicly) bureaucratic civilizational management is based on (hyper)compartmentalization. Chinese and Russian leaders (franchisees) get their compartmentalized scripts. The geoeconomic scripts themselves are emergent phenomena coming out of the public-nonpublic boundary state. My Dad was career CIA and nobody ever knew what anybody else was working on, not even the station chiefs. Everything last little thing went directly from and then back-to Langley. As above so below: the various 'nation state' franchisees operate in separate compartments and all geopolitical coordination is centralized. Every complex business on the planet is run in exactly the same manner more or less.
Again, I'm not a supporter of either party and I never have been. Gaza is clearly genocide. However, the democrats have clearly gone insane and deserted middle class Americans and the poor 2 decades ago. Regardless, I just love the exposure of the poisonous creatures and rot falling out of the AID rotten log...
USAID paid Hollywood stars for trips to Ukraine
Sean Pen, Orlando Bloom, Jean-Claude Van Damme and other Hollywood stars publicly stated that they were on the side of the Ukrainians in the conflict with Russia and even traveled to Kyiv. But not for nothing, but for round sums. Van Dam received $1,500,000, Ben Stiller $4,000,000, Sean Penn $5,000,000, Orlando Bloom $8,000,000. Angelina Jolie was the most expensive - she was paid as much as $20,000,000.
👍 Subscribe, The Truth Is Behind Us
12.9Kviews
09:03
https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin
Those numbers are so big as to be suspicious for money laundering.
The Democratic party dynamic (and hence the post-GFC neoliberalism in general) of the last couple decades was just how the Hidden Hand of the global Elites had to manage the socioeconomics in order to stave off collapse from the global peak in conventional oil production. It had to be one political party or the other, and the liberal party was the more natural fit, obviously, since political conservatism is self-limiting.
Thank you from Northern Ireland for your excellent updates.
You are most welcome, Steve. Your days are getting notably longer now. I'm sure you can appreciate that. Ireland is lovely and green in the summer. We bike toured the Burren as a family in 2005.
"Russia is sitting on 70%, already, thwarting globalist "owners""
Why would you imply that Trump is doing the globalists' bidding here regarding Ukrainian rare earth resources when you clearly believe that Trump is opposed to the globalists because, in no small part no doubt, the globalists are tirelessly trying (and failing, apparently) to kill him? Makes no sense, to say nothing of the fact that the globalists also own Russian lock stock and barrel.
You are making up thoughts in my head to refute, Ben.
Well Trump obviously knows that Russia is sitting on 70pc if you know that Russia is sitting on 70pc... so who else's bidding, if not the globalists', could he be doing if he wants to wrest them from Russia.
You think he's doing his own bidding? That this is a three-way grudge match between Russia, the globalists, and the superman Donald J Trump (plus his 4 man crew of cosplaying avengers)?
I think Trump, like FDR, deals with a lot of other oligarchs, that there is a lot of negotiation, and that their desires are not unified in this time of rapid change.
Trump is throwing out propositions which may be useful in negotiations.
Of course the mines can't be wrested from Russia, as they have been made part of Russia, but the "ownership" of them remains negotiable, and that "ownership" is collateral for leveraged loans, and so on.
The articles often have a more nationalistic perspective, but I think banking/finance explains motives better for these assets.
It really looks like Russian-US cooperation on a lot of things would be good for Russia, the US and Europe, but financiers want things to go according to their schemes.
Yet the private financiers finance everything that everybody on the planet does, includingbthe DEW program that can disintegrate swaths of America with impunity but somehow can't kill Trump.. All public new money 'oligarchs' are front oligarchs of private finance. Their wealth is in central banknotes. As I've said a million times, you invert the structuralism of the situation and put the financiers below the new money 'oligarchs,' which is also what both PBS and Fox News does.
It's like thinking the towers were brought down by men with box cutters.
I agree, and have explored in excerpted articles here, that the development of supranational finance (Venice, etc.) enabled bigger wars and debt-servitude of nations, and should be cut at the roots.
We approach a system-wide crash/reset. "Ownership" by supranational finance is the root, at which to strike.
Some have clearer views of that. I think Trump and Musk do, but where will they go in the collapse?
I will pay attention, and have some guarded hopes, but I don't pretend to know where we will be at even the end of Musk's 130 day "special-employment". https://www.cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-special-government-employee-what-does-that-mean/
If you agree, then, then that agreement capability needs to also be agreement capable of the finer details of that agreement: if you strike at the root of the tree of civilization then you destroy civilization altogether; as you well know, it is impossible to fell a mature tree in order to separate it from its roots, and then graft that stumpless treetop onto the next stump over. The leaves of the tree photosynthesize but there can be no tree without roots to feed it.
The only way to adapt the system to collapse is for the system itself to adapt. The treetop cannot turn on its roots. It doesn't know how and it doesn't have a chainsaw and a sawyer to hire. This is not cartoonland.
Occam's Razor.
Ben, may I invite you to entertain the thought that since Jack Kennedy departed this life, every single POTUS has been reading from a script, just giving a performance. It wouldn't surprise me at all to discover that the so called "leaders" of China and Russia haven't had sight of the script and been given walk on parts in what is shaping up to be the end of Western civilization.
The folks running the show have known since the '50s that easy, cheap oil would be gone within 60years with the result being the theatrical production we are all now being treated to.
From the antics of 9/11 to Trump's ear having a close encounter with a bullet, all pure pantomime to anyone with well developed critical thinking skills.
It's shaping up to be the end of the whole of industrial civilization, Paul, both East and West.
Non-public-originated but (publicly) bureaucratic civilizational management is based on (hyper)compartmentalization. Chinese and Russian leaders (franchisees) get their compartmentalized scripts. The geoeconomic scripts themselves are emergent phenomena coming out of the public-nonpublic boundary state. My Dad was career CIA and nobody ever knew what anybody else was working on, not even the station chiefs. Everything last little thing went directly from and then back-to Langley. As above so below: the various 'nation state' franchisees operate in separate compartments and all geopolitical coordination is centralized. Every complex business on the planet is run in exactly the same manner more or less.
Agreed?