Poetic Justice

Jurists,

  I will present an elegant thought which the Universe just gave to me.

  The mandatory-voluntary-COVID-gene-therapy-vaccine-product-scheme appears to be a war crime of mass genocide. These bioweapons and "countermeasure-prototypes"  cause immunodeficiency. Immunodeficiency leads to slow death from unusual causes, as we will recall from the AIDS pandemic.

  This genocidal war crime appears to have been actively facilitated at the highest levels of global governance, finance and military, as well as facilitated at all operational levels below that. There was information-sharing on a "need-to-know-basis", and multiple false-explanations, shared in various operational-silos. Some knew most of it. It looks like Tony Fauci was that high-level of an operative, and had been for decades. Bill Gates was there, too.

  Many knew less, or could entertain some comfortable fiction or another, while their bread got buttered on this side, and risks of butter-shortage in the future got "externalized" onto billions of mere mortals. The "risks" in this case are the certainty that notional wealth exceeds physical wealth in our world by a factor of at least 10X, even without "derivatives". The "risk" is the certainty that some time soon, losses will need to be "assigned". They can most easily be assigned to the dead. They can also be assigned to those who are terrified into willing-compliance, such as might be the case for those getting e-money when they suddenly find they have no way to pay rent or bills, nor fill their gas tank.

  Other categories of mortal-human would be more troublesome in pressing their claims to Social Security, their 401k packages, and so on.

  Assigning losses, which constitute 90% of notional wealth will be a very hard political needle to thread. Those who now control the levers of wealth and power need to have already established a mechanism of firm control before the next western global financial crisis, in order to minimize their own losses.

  What if financial losses were assigned first to all those who had been instrumental or complicit in the bioweapon-war-crimes "solution" to serve current power elites and help sustain them in their positions of power?

  "You conspired to kill billions of people without leaving fingerprints. You are given the choice of your-money-or-your-life. If you choose to live, you will receive your Social Security and Medicare benefits, but will relinquish all other claims on wealth. What do you choose, Mr. Gates, Dr. Fauci?"

  As you see, even family fortunes would be subject to this particular test, and corporate fortunes.

  It has a poetic-justice element, as well. Hell, SOMEBODY has to accept massive losses, why not those "most-deserving" first?

Is this an idea whose time has almost-come?

  Sasha Latypova reveals the details of the Pfizer/Moderna contracts with the US DoD, which appear to absolve them of all responsibility for any outcomes related to the bioweapon-countermeasure-prototypes they were contracting to provide 100-million prototype-copies of in multi-dose, preservative-free vials for injection.
  This was clearly a work-around to circumvent established contract laws. It is internally inconsistent, and there are intriguing redactions, which are also analyzed for potential meaning and implications.
Part 2 of "Contracts for Crimes" - Pfizer's ATI-MCDC Technical Direction Letter

Part 2 of "Contracts for Crimes" - Pfizer's ATI-MCDC Technical Direction Letter

  Tom Luongo: The War For the Dollar Is Already Over, Part-1 (No Eurodollars for You!)  [This is staged to impose international financial losses in Europe first, sacrificing a global $US, to preserve the national currency of the United States of America.]

  And the Fed has won. In the words of Ambassador Kosh from the classic television series Babylon 5, “The avalanche has started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.”
  For nearly the past two years I’ve been a nearly lone voice in the wilderness questioning the financial orthodoxy over the behavior of the Federal Reserve. It started with an innocent, if not openly naïve question back in June of 2021, “Could the Fed actually be getting off the globalist train?” ....

​..​I argued strenuously that in order for FOMC Chair Jerome Powell to make this new sovereign US monetary policy stick, he would have to ‘pull a Volcker’ and raise rates aggressively. This would expose the lies of the “Biden” administration about deflation and the need for trillions more in COVID-19 relief funds — the Build Back Better bill.
​  ​It would uncover who on Capitol Hill was aligned with the Fed and the New York Banks it represents, or, at least, who had their backing...

​..​Even as I was making these arguments I never thought Powell would actually do it.​  ​Then he did it.​..

​..​The Fed, through aggressive rate hikes and fundamental changes to its transmission of monetary policy, has placed the biggest burden on on US dollar markets overseas, not domestically...Go back to what I’ve been saying for over a year, the Fed is not raising rates to combat inflation. The Fed is raising rates to drain offshore dollar markets and force the offshore dollar trade to take its cues from the domestic cost of dollars as priced by ​(US-based) ​SOFR​-Secured Overnight Financing Rate​, not (​L​ondon based) ​LIBOR​-London Interbank Offered Rate​...

​..​SOFR knocked out the Eurodollar because that was the Fed’s and New York’s ultimate goal; to replace the global rate for dollars with a domestic one where the capital would have to trade here. The globe takes its cues, not from what Europe or Hong Kong wants, but what America needs.
​  ​This stabilizes our banking system, taking back power the Fed had ceded under Greenspan, Bernanke and Yellen and reminding everyone else just who runs Bartertown.
​  ​Most importantly, it pulls liquidity from around the world back into US markets, providing a foundation for a future where Davos doesn’t control DC. https://tomluongo.me/2023/03/05/war-for-dollar-already-over-no-eurodollar/

Gail Tverberg: When the Economy Gets Squeezed by Too Little Energy
​  ​Most people have a simple, but wrong, idea about how the world economy will respond to “not enough energy to go around.” They expect that oil prices will rise. With these higher prices, producers will be able to extract more fossil fuels so the system can go on as before. They also believe that wind turbines, solar panels and other so-called renewables can be made with these fossil fuels, perhaps extending the life of the system further.
​  ​The insight people tend to miss is the fact that the world’s economy is a physics-based, self-organizing system. Such economies grow for many years, but ultimately, they collapse. The underlying problem is that the population tends to grow too rapidly relative to the energy supplies necessary to support that population. History shows that such collapses take place over a period of years. The question becomes: What happens to an economy beginning its path toward full collapse?
​  ​One of the major uses for fossil fuel energy is to add complexity to the system. For example, roads, electricity transmission lines, and long-distance trade are forms of complexity that can be added to the economy using fossil fuels.
​  ​When energy per capita falls, it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain the complexity that has been put in place. It becomes too expensive to properly maintain roads, electrical services become increasingly intermittent, and trade is reduced. Long waits for replacement parts become common. These little problems build on one another to become bigger problems. Eventually, major parts of the world’s economy start failing completely.
​  ​When people forecast ever-rising energy prices, they miss the fact that market fossil fuel prices consider both oil producers and consumers. From the producer’s point of view, the price for oil needs to be high enough that new oil fields can be profitably developed. From the consumer’s point of view, the price of oil needs to be sufficiently low that food and other goods manufactured using oil products are affordable. In practice, oil prices tend to rise and fall, and rise again. On average, they don’t satisfy either the oil producers or the consumers. This dynamic tends to push the economy downward.
​  ​There are many other changes, as well, as fossil fuel energy per capita falls. Without enough energy products to go around, conflict tends to rise. Economic growth slows and turns to economic contraction, creating huge strains for the financial system. In this post, I will try to explain a few of the issues involved.​...

​..​The US Department of Energy states that it will be necessary to double or triple the size of the US electric grid to accommodate the proposed level of clean energy, including EVs, by 2050. This is, of course, a kind of complexity. If we are already having difficulty with maintaining complexity, how do we expect to double or triple the size of the US electric grid? The rest of the world would likely need such an upgrade, as well. A huge increase in fossil fuel energy, as well as complexity, would be required.
​  ​[3] The world’s economy is a physics-based system, called a dissipative structure.​..

​..To a significant extent, how these changes happen is related to the maximum power principle, postulated by ecologist Howard T. Odum. Even when some inputs are inadequate, self-organizing ecosystems try to maintain themselves, as best possible, with the reduced supplies. Odum said, “During self-organization, system designs develop and prevail that maximize power intake, energy transformation, and those uses that reinforce production and efficiency.”​....

​..​We often hear that the US is the largest economy, but this is only true if GDP is measured in current US dollars. If differences in actual purchasing power are reflected, China is significantly ahead. China is also far ahead in total electricity production and in many types of industrial output, including cement, steel, and rare earth minerals.
​  ​The conflict in Ukraine is now leading countries to take sides, with Russia and China on the same side, and the United States together with the EU on Ukraine’s side. While the US has many military bases around the world, its military capabilities have increasingly been stretched thin. The US is a major oil producer, but the mix of oil it produces is of lower and lower average quality, especially if obtaining diesel and jet fuel from it are top priorities.​..

​..Huge pressure is building now for China and Russia to trade in their own currencies, rather than the US dollar, putting pressure on the US financial sm and its status as the reserve cuysterrency. It is also not clear whether the US would be able to fight on more than one front in a conventional war. A conflict with Iran has been mentioned as a possibility, as has a conflict with China over Taiwan. It is not at all clear that a conflict between NATO and China-Russia is winnable by the NATO forces, including the US.
​  ​It appears to me that, to save fuel, more regionalization of trade is necessary with the Asian countries being primary trading partners of each other, rather than the rest of the world. If such a regionalization takes place, the US will be at a disadvantage.​..

​..Every politician would like a “happily ever after” story to tell citizens. Fortunately, from the point of view of politicians, there are lots of economists and scientists who put together what I call “overly simple” models of the economy. With these overly simple models of the economy, there is no problem ahead. They believe the standard narrative about oil and other energy prices rising indefinitely, so there is no energy problem. Instead, our only problem is climate change and the need to transition to green energy.
​  ​The catch is that our ability to scale up green energy is just an illusion, built on the belief that complexity can scale up indefinitely without the use of fossil fuels.
​  ​We are left with a major problem: Our current complex economy is in danger of degrading remarkably in the next few years, but we have no replacement available.​ [So what will the new-emergency story be? There is a lot which needs to be ignored. It will have to be a ​truly ​compelling emergency.​ Nuclear War?​] ​​https://ourfiniteworld.com/2023/03/05/when-the-economy-gets-squeezed-by-too-little-energy/

​  Alastair Crooke: ​How Could Western Intelligence Have Got It Wrong, Again? They Didn’t. They Had Other Purposes  Thanks Figmund Sreud.

​ ​ The logic then is that a war prolonged (until the money runs out) must deliver a Russia bereft of munitions, and NATO-supplied Ukraine ‘wins’.
  ​This framing is entirely wrong because of conceptual differences: Russian history is one of Total War that is fought in a long, ‘all-out’, uncompromising engagement against an overwhelming peer force. But inherent to this idea, is its all-important grounding in the conviction that such wars are fought over the course of years, with their outcomes conditioned by the capacity to surge military production.
​ ​Conceptually, the U.S. shifted in the 1980s away from its post-war military-industrial paradigm, to off-shore manufacturing to Asia and to ‘just-in-time’ supply lines. Effectively, the U.S. (and the West) shifted in the opposite direction to ‘surge capacity’, whereas Russia did not: It kept alive the notion of sustainment which had contributed to saving Russia during the Great Patriotic War.
​  ​So, western intelligence services again got it wrong; they misread the reality? No, they didn’t get it ‘wrong’. Their purpose was different.
​  ​The few who got it right were mercilessly caricatured as stooges to make them seem absurd. And Intelligence 101 was re-conceived as the purposeful denialism of all off-Team thinking, whilst the majority of western citizens would live passively in the embrace the groupthink – until too late for them to awaken, and to change the dangerous course on which their societies were embarked.
​  ​Unverified Ukrainian reports (liaison reporting) served up to western leaders therefore is not a ‘glitch’ – it is a ‘feature’ of the new Intelligence 101 paradigm intended to confuse and dull its electorate. https://strategic-culture.org/news/2023/03/06/how-could-western-intelligence-have-got-it-wrong-again-they-didnt-they-had-other-purposes/

​  ​On March 2, 2023, the people in control of the Joe Biden administration officially announced that government control of internet content was now officially a part of the national security apparatus. [White House Link] If you have followed the history of how the Fourth Branch of Government has been created, you will immediately recognize the intent of this new framework...​ 

..In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus, instructed by Vice President Dick Cheney, was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.
​  ​After 9/11/01, the electronic surveillance system that was originally created to monitor threats from abroad was retooled to monitor threats inside our country.  That is when all of our electronic ‘metadata’ came under federal surveillance.
​  ​That inflection point, and the process that followed, was exactly what Edward Snowden tried to point out.
​  ​What Barack Obama and Eric Holder did with that new construct was refine the internal targeting mechanisms so that only their political opposition became the target of this new national security system.
​  ​The problems we face now as a country are directly an outcome of two very distinct points that were merged by Barack Obama. (1) The post 9/11 monitoring of electronic communication of American citizens; and (2) Obama’s team creating a fine-tuning knob that it focused on the politics of the targets.  This is very important to understand as you dig deeper into this research outline. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/03/04/people-behind-biden-announce-creation-of-formal-national-surveillance-state-yet-no-one-seems-bothered/

​  "Anybody but US/NATO" is who blew up Nordstream.​

​  ​US Intelligence Now Says Pro-Ukraine, Possibly Government-Trained Mystery Forces Destroyed Nord Stream Pipelines

​  ​Now, four weeks after Hersh's bombshell report, anonymous US intelligence officials tell the NY Times that the saboteurs are likely 'pro-Ukraine, possibly government-trained Ukrainian or Russian nationals, or some combination of the two,' but that 'no American or British nationals were involved.' https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-intelligence-now-says-pro-ukraine-possibly-government-trained-mystery-forces

​  Look, it was these 6 people in this rented yacht! It wasn't the summer 2022 NATO "Baltops" exercise at all. (Whew! What a relief.)

​  ​German authorities probing explosions at the Nord Stream gas pipelines have identified a vessel which was reportedly used in the attack on the pipelines. The yacht belongs to a Polish-based company owned by two Ukrainians, according to the reports.
​  ​German state broadcaster ARD, SWR radio and Die Zeit newspaper launched what they called their own joint journalistic investigation into the activities of German law enforcement authorities involved in this case.
​  ​Their findings indicate the yacht set sail from the German northeastern port city of Rostock on September 6, having received explosives and equipment for the operation from a delivery truck. The yacht was later identified on the Danish island of Christianso, located just north-east of the island of Bornholm, where the pipelines were damaged on September 26, 2022.
​  ​The vessel was then returned to the owners, where investigators managed to find traces of explosives on a cabin table, the outlets claim. The sabotage was reportedly carried out by a team of six people, including a captain, two divers, two diving assistants, and a female doctor. https://www.rt.com/news/572615-vessel-nord-stream-sabotage-identified/

​  ​US army resumes theft of Syrian oil weeks after deadly quake https://thecradle.co/article-view/22027/us-army-resumes-theft-of-syrian-oil-weeks-after-deadly-quake

​  This firing of "pro-NATO" military officers in Hungary came about a week after Victoria Nuland paid a friendly visit to Budapest, didn't it?​ Was this going to be like the thwarted military coup against Erdogan in Turkey, by NATO-friendly military officers, which Russia warned Erdogan about at the last minute?

​  ​The daily news announced that “hundreds of high-ranking military officers sacked in Hungary”. From the article:
​  ​Multiple Hungarian media outlets reported that Hungary’s defense minister sacked hundreds of high-ranking military officers. The people concerned have two months to leave and will get 70 percent of their current salaries as a pension-like allowance even if they continue to work. The minister says the move served the rejuvenation and modernisation of the army. The opposition believes the government fired pro-NATO officers. https://internationalman.com/articles/a-massive-global-restructuring-is-underway-heres-what-it-means-for-europe/

​I presume that you have seen these pictures and related video. There is more to come.

Jan. 6 footage shows Capitol cops escorting QAnon Shaman to Senate floor

https://nypost.com/2023/03/06/jan-6-footage-shows-cops-bringing-qanon-shaman-to-senate-floor/

Weighing Evidence (pictured mowing lawn a few days ago in avocado orchard hit by Christmas Eve cold front)