Korybko is out of his mind if he thinks the Russia-China gas deal will be canceled for any reason, let alone some sort of treaty with America, which breaks all treaties...Berg was an obvious patsy, who had been fighting in the Ukraine and may have been killed there..the body hasn't been proven to be his yet...Putin isn't going to give Ukraine any deals that aren't 100% in his favor, with Medvedev, the Security Council and the Russian people wanting blood and real security..I suggest total control of the Black Sea and a Russia friendly rump Ukraine government which is disarmed and landlocked...
The police State in the UK hates the working and middle classes, but the London bankers made an extremely disastrous gamble on the Ukraine, and are insolvent... If the Brits want to survive with any kind of future, they will get rid of both....but they don't act like fighters to me...
I'm just watching the show go on. Korybko is worth reading, but I don't think there's anybody I always agree with, and I'm often wrong in my projections, too.
Life...
Don't sell English, Scots and Welsh-persons short yet, but the odds are stacked against them by the owners right now, cutting them off from food and fuel and options.
The Brits let conman Tony Blair take away their firearms, and now they are being treated like slaves...Recently police found 5 Pakis in a house with two naked 13yo girls whom they had gang raped...They arrested the girls, not the rapists...Even slaves were treated better than that in America...
I suspect they arrested the girls for everybody's safety in the situation. The army should have promptly followed them, though. One might assume that the rapists would violently resist arrest.
I would say that's sound speculation, John. pyrrhus this is the second thread Iin a row that you've brought up this gang rape incident, and your slave narrative is a bit rich to say the least. Seems to me the Elites got their hooks in you at the moment. Step outside of the consent factory. If young Pakistanis are gang raping girls then you might also have some pity for their immigrant plight. The catastrophic, cumulative cultural disturbances of their homeland -- for which England itself bears some colonial responsibility -- and multicultural mismatches (extreme muslim sexual stricture meets a hypersexuaized West) that led to that dreasful. manic behavior is understandable if we embrace human ecology rather than politics.
It is a long draft that I compose progressively. Gmail used to keep a history of drafts, but it no longer does. Now it just omits them once in awhile. There are other insults.
I work right on the substack draft to compose, tis really good about saving drafts either off phone or desktop, automatic....never lost one except if they don't like my pics , then it declares system failure error unfixable
Thank You, Grasshopper, and I have done some of that retracing-steps on Substack, but I send in 3 formats, and it is hard to compose from saved, organized tabs unless I use the gmail. I still send to a few folks that way and www.johndayblog.com is still an active Google Blogger site, though I added Substack after google overtly censored my blog and cancelled my gmail just before the start of the "special Military Operation".
John cold snap headed your way? Living at the latitude you're at must be a bit frustrating. If I lived at such a location I would likely be doing the same as you are. Trying things at the edge of my agricultural zone. I've had some success here with Gladiola bulbs. They're supposed to be dug up every rear as the ground freezes too deep for them to survive. I have a patch protected from the harsh winter northerlies that keep popping back up for four years running now! No extra protection placed over them. Here's to hoping your banana experiment survives well enough to give you some fruit!
It got down to 28F before dawn, and stayed there for some hours. We shall see if any bananas make it through that. The Thai Namwah variety is somewhat cold tolerant, like the Venezuelan Orinoco variety. So far, the Namwahs do best for me, but the Orinocos do better for a guy on the east side of Houston.
John, Ben I certainly don't know anything about Ivermectin or biochemistry. I was simply wondering where the drug was so effective on common parasites in the animal husbandry world was there any logic in thinking that some virus' are just microscopic insects. That said thank both of you for your time and effort in your responses. They have helped me to understand these things a bit more. I'm a long long way from "knowing" but have a insatiable desire to acquire new to me knowledge. I do know enough to understand I don't really know anything.
Thanks Red and I didn't mean to be harsh in my first reply, I just get a little frustrated sometimes with establishmentarian rigidity. John and I have gone a few rounds on this topic before.
So-called 'viruses' are RNA or DNA inside a hard protein case (capsid) inside a preservative lipid membrane that generally has enzymes embedded in it for reacting with enzymes embedded in other membranes, which is the 'lock and key' function John and me were talking about.
But that exact structure is also what the more recent, cutting -edge science of exosomal proteomics has established is the morphological structure of signaling exosomes that are made and released by our cells and form the foundation of our intercellular signaling system.
Ivermectin is just a chemical disinfectant. Get the dose right and it kills the little stuff you've decided you want to kill but only imperceptibly stresses the sheep or goat, the big stuff. That's what an antibiotic is. Problem is it also kills the good little stuff, which is another stresser, and probably the bigger one.
As a livestock farmer myself, I choose not to treat for parasites because parasites cannot hurt us if we are in good health. Healthy animals have low parasite loads and under those low load ecologies, these parasites are scientifically known now to be beneficial contributors to our microbiome. It's the yin-yang thing again. Worms in balance inside of us are good for us. When we become unhealthy we can have too many of them and their critical mass causes symptoms in us that alert us to our diseased state so that we can get back in balance, maybe take some black walnut drops if we choose to. Or not. Maybe just do it the old fashioned way and live healthier.
I choose not to treat any of my livestock. If they start having problems it's on me to provide the adequate conditions for them to thrive again. If I were to just treat them with disinfectants in order to be able to confine them for longer in areas that caused them to get too many worms in the first place, I'm just doing to my charges what the Elites do to the global population. I'd never do that. Respecting a healthy carrying capacity matters.
When asked about his peaceful nature, Putin assured his audience of international journalists he is a peace seeker; ie. he’d do anything to bring peace and resolution to the Ukrainian conflict. After that, when asked about whom he’d rather see in the White House in 2025, he didn’t hesitate to say that Kamala was his favourite because he likes the way she laughs or lies, can’t remember now.
Now, if Putin was really sincere about his feelings about bringing peace and end to war in Ukraine, why would he say he’d rather see pro war Kamala in the office vs the end of the war Trump?
I have the answer to this question that nobody of your readers would like…
He was nowhere near the top, and he quit out of a certain kind of disgust at the corruption he saw. He got to Lieutenant Colonel, which is a critical level in most militaries for "going along with the game". He was, by all accounts, a patriotic idealist, who never took a bribe. Most people like that would not be promoted past Major, but he did have talent and nerves of steel; remaining cool under pressure in East Berlin.
Please don’t believe any so-called history written by the winners… As I said before, you don’t get to the position Putin is in unless you are respected or feared.
There is no respect in totalitarian regimes. None.
There is no such thing as patriotism when you cut a deal with the major religion of your country for support but the competition will be eliminated by brutal force. When the war that began in 2014 with Ukraine was going to become official in 2022, do you know what happened to the Ukrainian and Russian Orthodox churches and why?
If you do know, you will have the answer what the major aspect others then monetary of this war was.
I have kept track of what was going on with the Russian and "Ukrainian" Orthodox churches, and what I have mainly seen is a difficult position for the churches, having priests imprisoned and property seized by the Ukrainian state on the pretense of "supporting Russia".
I do want the best, most accurate information, which I have long sought out. I do not have an ideological axe to grind.
Thanks for your modesty, John. This is a very good quality you often display on your blog. :-)
I have only one view on the matter: religion should stay out of politics. The moment it gets involved in matters outside of faith, it is compromised…IMV…
Here in Greece we have a very different view on Russia, Syria etc. than American and northwest Europeans do so I don't agree with your takes on Putin and Russia / Ukraine which seem to me downright skewed. For example, Ukraine - not Russia as you imply - started the war against their own Ukrainian citizens in Donbass in 2014. They are still attacking them, wake up.
Of course we see things differently though, since Greece and Turkey were "inducted" into NATO - without consultation - almost immediately so that Al Capone could control Russia's access to the Med, NOT because either country is considered "west", which thank God we are not, nor even "white" for that matter since in ignorant "west"'s view everyone east and south of Poland is asiatic / "brown". Beyond the "pale" so to speak, to give that phrase another meaning! So yes, though captive, we persist in seeing our region clearly. After all we live here.
I certainly don't agree with what SEEMS to be your take on Orthodoxy, the original Christianity which 95% of Americans and western Europeans know absolutely nothing about.
So my question is, why be so coy? Why not inform us of "the truth" as you see it.? This blog is the perfect safe place.
Thanks for your comment but I absolutely don’t understand what your point is. Maybe you can explain what you mean by “original Christianity’? Is it the one that began with the Roman Emperor Constantine at the beginning of the 4th century? Or perhaps with Jesus?
Some barnyard logic here. Way back in '60's, when dinosaurs roomed the earth, if you got a cold or flu my parents and grandparents would say "you picked up a bug". Fast forward to now and in the barnyard I use Ivermectin both topically and with injection to control parasites such as ticks and liver flukes. Now I'm wondering in light of the recent events and the success of said medication against the vid are virus' actually "bugs". Antibiotics don't work on them because they aren't bacterial. Perhaps over simplified logic here but if they're not bacteria then are they animal? Would Ivermectin have worked on flu's and the common cold better than anything offered on the drug store shelves?
Viruses are like a chain-letter that says to write and send 100 of the same letter.
There are specific viral proteins and enzymes they code for. Something might happen to interfere with one or more of these, or some other critical function of the virus, or of it's mechanism(s) of harm to the body.
Ivermectin, derived from a Japanese soil bacterium molecule, happened to interfere with several coronavirus functions and harms. Ivermectin was just a really useful molecule with that virus. We discovered a LOT of medicines for other things which slowed COVID down.
It is really empirical hit & miss with antivirals.
When you start from falsehood, everything that follows is false. Virology claims that 'viruses' only interact with cytoplasmic ribosomes yet everything that the cell does is explicitly approved by the DNA in our nucleus. Why would the DNA agree to make 'viruses' that kill it? It wouldn't. It's science fiction born of an allopathic culture that mistakes disease symptoms for the causal trauma itself when in biological truth the symptoms are the healing protocol. Healing from trauma is... traumatic. The only way we can understand what is going on with biology is to look at it from a biochemical systems theory perspective - and that is not as rote a statement of scientific materialism as it may seem. To answer your question regarding whether ivermectin can suppress 'colds' and 'flus', Red, it depends. If you step outside of allopathic, fake germ theory, you will see that colds and flus are secondary structural water-soluble and fat-soluble detoxifications, respectively, and that the falsely associated viruses are in truth the signaling exosomes that signal for these spectacularly coordinated detoxes across the trillion-fold culture of cells we call the human being. Whether or not ivermectin can stop a cold or flu depends on the dose but it also depends on how necessary the detox is. If the body really NEEDS needs to detox then it will overwhelm the biochemical mechanism of action of ivermectin by diluting the ivermectin dosage, if possible, by having cells crank out that many more signaling exosomes. What is ivermectin? Can either of you guys even talk about it when you don't know what it is? It's a lactone which is a relative of an alkyl which is a relative of an alkane which is the shortest-chain hydrocarbon at one carbon atoms. Ivermectin is a hydrocarbon which makes it a toxic alcohol. As you both know, alcohols cut fat. Despite its marketing as otherwise, ivermectin is just a broad spectrum antibiotic because at the common dosage it dissolves the lipid membranes of helminths and bacteria and signaling exosomes -- and presumably among some other microbes -- because those biological structures have the thinnest membranes. Our cells membranes are thicker so generally speaking, at 'therapeutic' doses our exposed cells are only stressed (injured) by the solvent. Big doses are fatal.
Ivermectin is a really big, fancy molecule with 48 carbons, which looks like it has multiple configurational states in various conditions. https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00602
Ivermectin is considered a lactone because it is a molecule containing a large, cyclic ester group (a "macrocyclic lactone") within its chemical structure, specifically derived from the naturally occurring avermectin produced by the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis; this cyclic ester functional group is what defines a lactone molecule.
Key points about ivermectin and lactones:
Chemical structure:
Ivermectin has a 16-membered ring structure with a lactone group within it, which is the defining characteristic of a macrocyclic lactone.
Origin:
Ivermectin is a semi-synthetic derivative of avermectin, a naturally occurring macrocyclic lactone produced by a soil bacterium.
Function:
The lactone ring in ivermectin plays a key role in its antiparasitic activity, allowing it to bind to specific receptors in the nervous system of parasites, leading to their paralysis and death.
Me again: I left our the Easter link. A lactone is an Easter which is a relative of an alkyl which is a relative of an alkane. It is irrelevant that this synthetic lactone drug which suspiciously was, as I understand it, discovered exactly once in a bacteria on a golf course in Japan only to never be found again, is a macrocyclic with other carbon atoms. The macrocyclic is the carrier. It is an ester, which are toxic.
AI overview of lactones:
While not all lactones are toxic, some types of lactones, particularly in large doses, can be considered toxic, especially macrocyclic lactones which can have severe effects like coma, respiratory failure, and even death if ingested in high amounts; however, the toxicity largely depends on the specific lactone molecule and the dosage involved.
Key points about lactone toxicity:
Variety in toxicity:
Different lactones have varying levels of toxicity, with some being relatively safe in normal quantities while others can be highly toxic depending on their chemical structure.
Macrocyclic lactones:
These types of lactones are often used as antiparasitic drugs but can be highly toxic at high doses, potentially affecting the nervous system.
Mechanism of toxicity:
Some lactones can disrupt cellular functions by interacting with specific receptors or causing damage to cell membranes.
See where it says that macrocyclic lactones are especially toxic. See where it says " damage to cell membranes." I do not buy the marketing that claims that ivermectin kills worms by messing with their nervous system first because in order to react with the nervous system they have to first go through the cell membrane. Would they also dissolve nerves? Yes, because nerves are also made of fat.
It is a really big, fancy molecule with multiple configurational states under different conditions. It will be a different kind of key in lots of microbiological mechanisms. It is a fancy enough molecule that computer modeling at different pH values would be useful to see what fits it can make into critical viral-encoded enzymes and things like that. Simple organic chemistry textbook answers can't adequately explain molecules this big and irregular. Look at the chemical drawing in the link, please.
Organic chemistry/biochemistry is a branch of physics, i'm laying out the simplified but fundamental physics of a carcinogenic fat-soluble hydrocarbon lactone's ability to cut fat. How is physics suddenly inadequate even after backing it up with AI's referencing of the literature? Virological lock and key false theory is irrelevant if the door (the membrane) has already been blown off its hinges. And we can see how nasty ivermectin is on the back end. Its main metabolites are hydroxylations which are alcohols and phenols. phenols are nasty. and it Takes cytochrome P450 to do it. p450 is the main heavy hitter for oxidizing (detoxifying) fat-soluble toxins into water-soluble ones.
Dr John: about to crash here 40 miles to your SE. Did not cover the garden but will tomorrow. I’m expecting some shit in the morning from DC since it’s Jan 6. If it doesn’t happen then or on Jan 20 then we can assume the deep state has their people in place and are not worried about Trump 2.0
We shall see. We might barely get a freeze tonight, but it is January, after all, and it is unusual to still have robust tomato plants with green tomatoes on them.
I just don't know what is going on in deep state warfare and positioning for attacks... There was that lip reader who said Obama told Biden "we still have plenty of time" shortly after the November election.
We had a good lettuce, arugala and broccoli crop this year...keep meaning to expand to other stuff like you but am too lazy/busy with covering 6 district courts in 6 counties
Don't believe Russia believes U.S. calls the shots for anything...
Russia, the nation helping the U.S. maintain its sovereignty through the Civil War when the International Crime Syndicate sought Foreign Occupation through the united Brit/French Navies, has paid dearly for that breach in opposition operational out of London, City of London, and now Switzerland.
Those of this Syndicate include both Putin and Trump among the select few managing all the nations...It's foolish to EVER imagine those ALLOWED WEALTH AND CONTROL to be ignorant of the actual Global Body Politic.
That is one read of history. There are many. There are many centers and threads of intelligence in our world, and competition at various levels and between levels, and in the spirit realms...
I don't pretend to know what will happen, or how it will happen (exactly), but I do my best to suss it out as we go.
Korybko is out of his mind if he thinks the Russia-China gas deal will be canceled for any reason, let alone some sort of treaty with America, which breaks all treaties...Berg was an obvious patsy, who had been fighting in the Ukraine and may have been killed there..the body hasn't been proven to be his yet...Putin isn't going to give Ukraine any deals that aren't 100% in his favor, with Medvedev, the Security Council and the Russian people wanting blood and real security..I suggest total control of the Black Sea and a Russia friendly rump Ukraine government which is disarmed and landlocked...
The police State in the UK hates the working and middle classes, but the London bankers made an extremely disastrous gamble on the Ukraine, and are insolvent... If the Brits want to survive with any kind of future, they will get rid of both....but they don't act like fighters to me...
I'm just watching the show go on. Korybko is worth reading, but I don't think there's anybody I always agree with, and I'm often wrong in my projections, too.
Life...
Don't sell English, Scots and Welsh-persons short yet, but the odds are stacked against them by the owners right now, cutting them off from food and fuel and options.
The Brits let conman Tony Blair take away their firearms, and now they are being treated like slaves...Recently police found 5 Pakis in a house with two naked 13yo girls whom they had gang raped...They arrested the girls, not the rapists...Even slaves were treated better than that in America...
I suspect they arrested the girls for everybody's safety in the situation. The army should have promptly followed them, though. One might assume that the rapists would violently resist arrest.
I am only speculating here...
I would say that's sound speculation, John. pyrrhus this is the second thread Iin a row that you've brought up this gang rape incident, and your slave narrative is a bit rich to say the least. Seems to me the Elites got their hooks in you at the moment. Step outside of the consent factory. If young Pakistanis are gang raping girls then you might also have some pity for their immigrant plight. The catastrophic, cumulative cultural disturbances of their homeland -- for which England itself bears some colonial responsibility -- and multicultural mismatches (extreme muslim sexual stricture meets a hypersexuaized West) that led to that dreasful. manic behavior is understandable if we embrace human ecology rather than politics.
might be interesting to keep your work on a separate file so you will at least have some left! Thank you for restarting !
It is a long draft that I compose progressively. Gmail used to keep a history of drafts, but it no longer does. Now it just omits them once in awhile. There are other insults.
sigh...
I work right on the substack draft to compose, tis really good about saving drafts either off phone or desktop, automatic....never lost one except if they don't like my pics , then it declares system failure error unfixable
Thank You, Grasshopper, and I have done some of that retracing-steps on Substack, but I send in 3 formats, and it is hard to compose from saved, organized tabs unless I use the gmail. I still send to a few folks that way and www.johndayblog.com is still an active Google Blogger site, though I added Substack after google overtly censored my blog and cancelled my gmail just before the start of the "special Military Operation".
John cold snap headed your way? Living at the latitude you're at must be a bit frustrating. If I lived at such a location I would likely be doing the same as you are. Trying things at the edge of my agricultural zone. I've had some success here with Gladiola bulbs. They're supposed to be dug up every rear as the ground freezes too deep for them to survive. I have a patch protected from the harsh winter northerlies that keep popping back up for four years running now! No extra protection placed over them. Here's to hoping your banana experiment survives well enough to give you some fruit!
It got down to 28F before dawn, and stayed there for some hours. We shall see if any bananas make it through that. The Thai Namwah variety is somewhat cold tolerant, like the Venezuelan Orinoco variety. So far, the Namwahs do best for me, but the Orinocos do better for a guy on the east side of Houston.
John, Ben I certainly don't know anything about Ivermectin or biochemistry. I was simply wondering where the drug was so effective on common parasites in the animal husbandry world was there any logic in thinking that some virus' are just microscopic insects. That said thank both of you for your time and effort in your responses. They have helped me to understand these things a bit more. I'm a long long way from "knowing" but have a insatiable desire to acquire new to me knowledge. I do know enough to understand I don't really know anything.
Thanks Red and I didn't mean to be harsh in my first reply, I just get a little frustrated sometimes with establishmentarian rigidity. John and I have gone a few rounds on this topic before.
So-called 'viruses' are RNA or DNA inside a hard protein case (capsid) inside a preservative lipid membrane that generally has enzymes embedded in it for reacting with enzymes embedded in other membranes, which is the 'lock and key' function John and me were talking about.
But that exact structure is also what the more recent, cutting -edge science of exosomal proteomics has established is the morphological structure of signaling exosomes that are made and released by our cells and form the foundation of our intercellular signaling system.
Ivermectin is just a chemical disinfectant. Get the dose right and it kills the little stuff you've decided you want to kill but only imperceptibly stresses the sheep or goat, the big stuff. That's what an antibiotic is. Problem is it also kills the good little stuff, which is another stresser, and probably the bigger one.
As a livestock farmer myself, I choose not to treat for parasites because parasites cannot hurt us if we are in good health. Healthy animals have low parasite loads and under those low load ecologies, these parasites are scientifically known now to be beneficial contributors to our microbiome. It's the yin-yang thing again. Worms in balance inside of us are good for us. When we become unhealthy we can have too many of them and their critical mass causes symptoms in us that alert us to our diseased state so that we can get back in balance, maybe take some black walnut drops if we choose to. Or not. Maybe just do it the old fashioned way and live healthier.
I choose not to treat any of my livestock. If they start having problems it's on me to provide the adequate conditions for them to thrive again. If I were to just treat them with disinfectants in order to be able to confine them for longer in areas that caused them to get too many worms in the first place, I'm just doing to my charges what the Elites do to the global population. I'd never do that. Respecting a healthy carrying capacity matters.
When asked about his peaceful nature, Putin assured his audience of international journalists he is a peace seeker; ie. he’d do anything to bring peace and resolution to the Ukrainian conflict. After that, when asked about whom he’d rather see in the White House in 2025, he didn’t hesitate to say that Kamala was his favourite because he likes the way she laughs or lies, can’t remember now.
Now, if Putin was really sincere about his feelings about bringing peace and end to war in Ukraine, why would he say he’d rather see pro war Kamala in the office vs the end of the war Trump?
I have the answer to this question that nobody of your readers would like…
Putin has a wry sense of humor. He keeps a mostly straight face, with maybe a twinkle in his eye...
How do you get to the top KGB position like he did? Do you think he got there by having a wry sense of humour?
He was nowhere near the top, and he quit out of a certain kind of disgust at the corruption he saw. He got to Lieutenant Colonel, which is a critical level in most militaries for "going along with the game". He was, by all accounts, a patriotic idealist, who never took a bribe. Most people like that would not be promoted past Major, but he did have talent and nerves of steel; remaining cool under pressure in East Berlin.
Was his semen sweeter after he ate pineapple?
Who knows? What do you think? I've never wondered.
That's what I've read, but not specifically about Vlad. That's why I asked.
You are delusional John, sorry to say that.
Please don’t believe any so-called history written by the winners… As I said before, you don’t get to the position Putin is in unless you are respected or feared.
There is no respect in totalitarian regimes. None.
There is no such thing as patriotism when you cut a deal with the major religion of your country for support but the competition will be eliminated by brutal force. When the war that began in 2014 with Ukraine was going to become official in 2022, do you know what happened to the Ukrainian and Russian Orthodox churches and why?
If you do know, you will have the answer what the major aspect others then monetary of this war was.
I have kept track of what was going on with the Russian and "Ukrainian" Orthodox churches, and what I have mainly seen is a difficult position for the churches, having priests imprisoned and property seized by the Ukrainian state on the pretense of "supporting Russia".
I do want the best, most accurate information, which I have long sought out. I do not have an ideological axe to grind.
Thanks for your modesty, John. This is a very good quality you often display on your blog. :-)
I have only one view on the matter: religion should stay out of politics. The moment it gets involved in matters outside of faith, it is compromised…IMV…
No ideological axe to grind. Thus the sneaky quotes around Ukranian.
Here in Greece we have a very different view on Russia, Syria etc. than American and northwest Europeans do so I don't agree with your takes on Putin and Russia / Ukraine which seem to me downright skewed. For example, Ukraine - not Russia as you imply - started the war against their own Ukrainian citizens in Donbass in 2014. They are still attacking them, wake up.
Of course we see things differently though, since Greece and Turkey were "inducted" into NATO - without consultation - almost immediately so that Al Capone could control Russia's access to the Med, NOT because either country is considered "west", which thank God we are not, nor even "white" for that matter since in ignorant "west"'s view everyone east and south of Poland is asiatic / "brown". Beyond the "pale" so to speak, to give that phrase another meaning! So yes, though captive, we persist in seeing our region clearly. After all we live here.
I certainly don't agree with what SEEMS to be your take on Orthodoxy, the original Christianity which 95% of Americans and western Europeans know absolutely nothing about.
So my question is, why be so coy? Why not inform us of "the truth" as you see it.? This blog is the perfect safe place.
Thanks for your comment but I absolutely don’t understand what your point is. Maybe you can explain what you mean by “original Christianity’? Is it the one that began with the Roman Emperor Constantine at the beginning of the 4th century? Or perhaps with Jesus?
Some barnyard logic here. Way back in '60's, when dinosaurs roomed the earth, if you got a cold or flu my parents and grandparents would say "you picked up a bug". Fast forward to now and in the barnyard I use Ivermectin both topically and with injection to control parasites such as ticks and liver flukes. Now I'm wondering in light of the recent events and the success of said medication against the vid are virus' actually "bugs". Antibiotics don't work on them because they aren't bacterial. Perhaps over simplified logic here but if they're not bacteria then are they animal? Would Ivermectin have worked on flu's and the common cold better than anything offered on the drug store shelves?
Viruses are like a chain-letter that says to write and send 100 of the same letter.
There are specific viral proteins and enzymes they code for. Something might happen to interfere with one or more of these, or some other critical function of the virus, or of it's mechanism(s) of harm to the body.
Ivermectin, derived from a Japanese soil bacterium molecule, happened to interfere with several coronavirus functions and harms. Ivermectin was just a really useful molecule with that virus. We discovered a LOT of medicines for other things which slowed COVID down.
It is really empirical hit & miss with antivirals.
When you start from falsehood, everything that follows is false. Virology claims that 'viruses' only interact with cytoplasmic ribosomes yet everything that the cell does is explicitly approved by the DNA in our nucleus. Why would the DNA agree to make 'viruses' that kill it? It wouldn't. It's science fiction born of an allopathic culture that mistakes disease symptoms for the causal trauma itself when in biological truth the symptoms are the healing protocol. Healing from trauma is... traumatic. The only way we can understand what is going on with biology is to look at it from a biochemical systems theory perspective - and that is not as rote a statement of scientific materialism as it may seem. To answer your question regarding whether ivermectin can suppress 'colds' and 'flus', Red, it depends. If you step outside of allopathic, fake germ theory, you will see that colds and flus are secondary structural water-soluble and fat-soluble detoxifications, respectively, and that the falsely associated viruses are in truth the signaling exosomes that signal for these spectacularly coordinated detoxes across the trillion-fold culture of cells we call the human being. Whether or not ivermectin can stop a cold or flu depends on the dose but it also depends on how necessary the detox is. If the body really NEEDS needs to detox then it will overwhelm the biochemical mechanism of action of ivermectin by diluting the ivermectin dosage, if possible, by having cells crank out that many more signaling exosomes. What is ivermectin? Can either of you guys even talk about it when you don't know what it is? It's a lactone which is a relative of an alkyl which is a relative of an alkane which is the shortest-chain hydrocarbon at one carbon atoms. Ivermectin is a hydrocarbon which makes it a toxic alcohol. As you both know, alcohols cut fat. Despite its marketing as otherwise, ivermectin is just a broad spectrum antibiotic because at the common dosage it dissolves the lipid membranes of helminths and bacteria and signaling exosomes -- and presumably among some other microbes -- because those biological structures have the thinnest membranes. Our cells membranes are thicker so generally speaking, at 'therapeutic' doses our exposed cells are only stressed (injured) by the solvent. Big doses are fatal.
Ivermectin is a really big, fancy molecule with 48 carbons, which looks like it has multiple configurational states in various conditions. https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00602
Here is the Google AI overview:
Ivermectin is considered a lactone because it is a molecule containing a large, cyclic ester group (a "macrocyclic lactone") within its chemical structure, specifically derived from the naturally occurring avermectin produced by the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis; this cyclic ester functional group is what defines a lactone molecule.
Key points about ivermectin and lactones:
Chemical structure:
Ivermectin has a 16-membered ring structure with a lactone group within it, which is the defining characteristic of a macrocyclic lactone.
Origin:
Ivermectin is a semi-synthetic derivative of avermectin, a naturally occurring macrocyclic lactone produced by a soil bacterium.
Function:
The lactone ring in ivermectin plays a key role in its antiparasitic activity, allowing it to bind to specific receptors in the nervous system of parasites, leading to their paralysis and death.
Me again: I left our the Easter link. A lactone is an Easter which is a relative of an alkyl which is a relative of an alkane. It is irrelevant that this synthetic lactone drug which suspiciously was, as I understand it, discovered exactly once in a bacteria on a golf course in Japan only to never be found again, is a macrocyclic with other carbon atoms. The macrocyclic is the carrier. It is an ester, which are toxic.
AI overview of lactones:
While not all lactones are toxic, some types of lactones, particularly in large doses, can be considered toxic, especially macrocyclic lactones which can have severe effects like coma, respiratory failure, and even death if ingested in high amounts; however, the toxicity largely depends on the specific lactone molecule and the dosage involved.
Key points about lactone toxicity:
Variety in toxicity:
Different lactones have varying levels of toxicity, with some being relatively safe in normal quantities while others can be highly toxic depending on their chemical structure.
Macrocyclic lactones:
These types of lactones are often used as antiparasitic drugs but can be highly toxic at high doses, potentially affecting the nervous system.
Mechanism of toxicity:
Some lactones can disrupt cellular functions by interacting with specific receptors or causing damage to cell membranes.
See where it says that macrocyclic lactones are especially toxic. See where it says " damage to cell membranes." I do not buy the marketing that claims that ivermectin kills worms by messing with their nervous system first because in order to react with the nervous system they have to first go through the cell membrane. Would they also dissolve nerves? Yes, because nerves are also made of fat.
It is a really big, fancy molecule with multiple configurational states under different conditions. It will be a different kind of key in lots of microbiological mechanisms. It is a fancy enough molecule that computer modeling at different pH values would be useful to see what fits it can make into critical viral-encoded enzymes and things like that. Simple organic chemistry textbook answers can't adequately explain molecules this big and irregular. Look at the chemical drawing in the link, please.
Organic chemistry/biochemistry is a branch of physics, i'm laying out the simplified but fundamental physics of a carcinogenic fat-soluble hydrocarbon lactone's ability to cut fat. How is physics suddenly inadequate even after backing it up with AI's referencing of the literature? Virological lock and key false theory is irrelevant if the door (the membrane) has already been blown off its hinges. And we can see how nasty ivermectin is on the back end. Its main metabolites are hydroxylations which are alcohols and phenols. phenols are nasty. and it Takes cytochrome P450 to do it. p450 is the main heavy hitter for oxidizing (detoxifying) fat-soluble toxins into water-soluble ones.
Dr John: about to crash here 40 miles to your SE. Did not cover the garden but will tomorrow. I’m expecting some shit in the morning from DC since it’s Jan 6. If it doesn’t happen then or on Jan 20 then we can assume the deep state has their people in place and are not worried about Trump 2.0
We shall see. We might barely get a freeze tonight, but it is January, after all, and it is unusual to still have robust tomato plants with green tomatoes on them.
I just don't know what is going on in deep state warfare and positioning for attacks... There was that lip reader who said Obama told Biden "we still have plenty of time" shortly after the November election.
We had a good lettuce, arugala and broccoli crop this year...keep meaning to expand to other stuff like you but am too lazy/busy with covering 6 district courts in 6 counties
You are "The Working Man" https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00602
;-)
Don't believe Russia believes U.S. calls the shots for anything...
Russia, the nation helping the U.S. maintain its sovereignty through the Civil War when the International Crime Syndicate sought Foreign Occupation through the united Brit/French Navies, has paid dearly for that breach in opposition operational out of London, City of London, and now Switzerland.
Those of this Syndicate include both Putin and Trump among the select few managing all the nations...It's foolish to EVER imagine those ALLOWED WEALTH AND CONTROL to be ignorant of the actual Global Body Politic.
That is one read of history. There are many. There are many centers and threads of intelligence in our world, and competition at various levels and between levels, and in the spirit realms...
I don't pretend to know what will happen, or how it will happen (exactly), but I do my best to suss it out as we go.