18 Comments

Oil is mostly burned in trivial pursuit.

Even more concerning to these few who force continuous governing is the decline in soil fertility. Should be a concern to everyone dependent on grocery store offerings, but is not.

Expand full comment

It'll be fine to live underground, eating MREs and watching videos for the rest of one's life.

Sounds good, right?

Expand full comment

Listening and reading about escaping reality sounds good to most people.., apparently.

Expand full comment

Maurice Strong of world reknown and former WEF head was a big player in the Club of Rome. Limits to Growth is another Noble Lie. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-edit-page/looking-behind-the-scenes-of-the-well-orchestrated-climate-hysteria/

Expand full comment

An excellent post drawing these subjects together. Many threads have been noted regarding these. But it is great to see them connected in this way. From what I think I understand about the pole shift and a Carrington type solar flare I seriously doubt if being underground is going to help them. They don't seem entirely intelligent in their understanding of much at all. Hubris kills.

Expand full comment

Thanks KW. My future is on the surface, and so are my allegiances.

:-)

Expand full comment

Good to know thanks.

Expand full comment

My hope is that enough people remain on the surface, and enough concrete trucks, and locations of all entries and air shafts are known/discovered, that the openings can all be filled with concrete.

Expand full comment

The term "fossil fuel" is a misnomer. Coal/Oil isn't made from squished dinosaur remains from eons ago. There was a natural experiment that was created when Mount St Helen's blew in 1980. Millions of trees landed in a lake and over a few years became waterlogged and sank. These trees have already started to turn into coal/oil. We will never run out of "fossil fuel".

https://youtu.be/kjdZ3Gs-PTk

Expand full comment

It's controversial, isn't it?

Russians believe in abiotic oil, but not every geologist does.

We can deal with that disagreement between experts and move on.

Expand full comment

We seem to have hit peak oil in 2018 after peak conventional oil in 2005.

And I don't believe they have nukes or nuclear power. They firebombed Hiroshima and I believe those nuclear power plants were really about burning sulfur.

Their solution to the current and growing energy shortfall was the shots.

So good luck to them underground. We won't miss them.

Expand full comment

US peak crude oil (conventional) graph shows 1970 as the year here:

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/images/2020.03.02/main.svg

Fracking surpassed it in 2018-2019, but it included lightweight "natural gas liquids".

Expand full comment

Here is a new video you can include in your blog: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDBJdQnjE2o

Expand full comment

I like Nate Hagans, and have included his essays and even videos in the past.

This is an hour. That's too much for me to watch.

I like Art Berman's work, too. He is an oil-man's-oil-man.

Expand full comment

I have been listening to interviews since 4:30 am. Slow day waiting for something to happen.

Expand full comment

A new video today on the pole shift.

Interesting.

https://youtu.be/zyBfxbvsWo0

Expand full comment

The earth's magnetic field weakening is a lot more than he says. It was 10% per century, accelerating, but between 2000 and 2010 it decreased 10% in one decade. Then NASA quite posting data. They are collecting it, but it's a secret now. One must presume that the field strength weakening is not linear, accelerating.

Expand full comment

Yes, we appear to be in for quite a ride. No wonder everything is topsy turvy.

Expand full comment