Pondering, Why has Robert Malone MD attacked Peter Breggin MD and his wife Ginger Breggin, with a lawsuit for $25 million? They seem to share common-cause in outing the dangers of the mRNA COVID-vaccines, with fairly minor differences. Dr. Malone does not sue those who call him a nut-case-tinfoil-hat-conspiracy-theorist for defamation, but sues Peter Breggin and his wife Ginger Breggin for "defamation" for their message that Malon's take on mass-formation-psychosis tends to let the elite owners, who pump it, off-the-hook.
John I have read all the terrible things that Breggin hurled at Malone. No question that he has gone away too far. Into really irrational things. Malone assembled then on his article! Breggin is a hazard to himself and must be stopped. IMHO.
Saddens me to read of the lawsuit. Understand defamation but I never thought less of either gent just because they disagreed. Neither do I understand the amount. Very sad.
Dec 2, 2022·edited Dec 2, 2022Liked by John Day MD
I have read the lawsuit. Have you? What the Breggins, Jane Ruby, et al, have published and publicly stated about Dr. Malone is shockingly defamatory. It is all conjecture and speculation. It appears to me they have taken threads of Dr. Malone's past and woven an outlandish narrative backed by their biases and current worldview. It made me look at the Breggins & Jane Ruby differently. I would have thought they would have a higher level of discernment before publishing such nonsense. Is it jealousy, a delusion or are they just hacks? I'm not defending Dr. Malone as some sort of hero. We have all taken different paths to get to where we are today. Dr. Malone's past in the mainstream medical/scientific complex doesn't make him, according to Breggin, "a supporter of any apologist for political mass murderers. He is not a Hitler apologist and/or a Hitler “excuser”. Breggin claims "Dr. Malone IS Dangerous. I knew from day one, this man is in the middle of every horrific thing that has happened to humanity. He is an operative running interference to keep this thing going" (another of Breggin's multiple off-base claims). I have also read the original letter from Dr. Malone's attorney asking the Breggins to retract their statements, apologize and come to some sort of amiable resolve without having to involve the court system. The Breggins responded by amplifying their public statements. They won't stop. They're obsessed and come off as foolish. So Dr. Malone is demanding a jury trial and the Breggins, Jane Ruby, et al, will have to defend their statements which I think are just baseless opinions that support the narrative of the Breggins' book and the POV of Jane Ruby's podcast.
I have since gone to the Breggins website where they are claiming to be victims. Their newest claim is Dr. Malone is trying to take down Dr. McCullough and Dr. Risch and any other doctor (including themselves) he sees as competition. They took 2 sentences out of a talk Dr. Malone gave where he mentioned Dr. McCullough and Dr. Risch and built a fanciful narrative essay around what that meant and have it currently published on their website. Maybe Breggin has lost it mentally? He comes off as delusional.
Dr. Malone feels he has suffered reputational harm and financial harm by the Breggins, et al. So he is now suing as they won't stop or retract. As far as the $25 million, the lawyer puts that dollar amount into this type of complaint. The lawyer chooses an amount that would be acceptable to the state where the trial will take place. A jury will ultimately decide any financial reward.
Thank you, as always, for saying what you say. Assigning motivations is difficult, but I stopped reading Malone substack a while ago, as it has gone in direction I find less interesting. The Desmet hypothesis of mass formation is useful and interesting but far from the whole truth. The psychology of societies is something that anyone looking at the covid mania has to somehow take into account. Strange kerfuffle that may make all involved look ugly, and one may get a feeling it is best to just walk away.
Regarding Malone vs. Breggin, I'm not happy to see people who, theoretically, fundamentally agree about the dangers of the jabs fighting each other publicly in court. This only serves to divide those opposed to the jabs.
That said, it is always fair game to criticize Science. That's what Scientists do. They question data, methodology, results and conclusions. They do not further science by attacking Scientists. It is one thing to say, "your conclusions suck", it is quite another to say, "you suck". The first is criticism in the pursuit of scientific truth, the second is ad hominem and is not "science".
Malone is Controlled Opposition. The Pfizer/BioNTech vax was fully approved by the Food and Drug Administration, even though an emergency use authorisation also remains in place. Dr Malone misleadingly said that Americans were only being offered the shot under emergency use authorisation and that it carried different liability ramifications. That makes him controlled op, so no surprise he's suing people really...
"Dr. Malone does not sue those who call him a nut-case-tinfoil-hat-conspiracy-theorist for defamation, but sues Peter Breggin and his wife Ginger Breggin for "defamation" for their message that Malon's take on mass-formation-psychosis tends to let the elite owners, who pump it, off-the-hook."
December 1st is here and the sanctions on Russian Oil starts the bite.
Millions of barrels of crude are going “off market” and there will be shortages of unsanctioned oil.
So price hikes are inevitable.
Couple that with the massive cooling going on from stratospheric volcanic ash, 2023 is going to be a very difficult year.
By 2024 the full extent of the damage and food shortages will be global.
Ukraine supplies 40% of the third worlds food supply and most of that will not be planted.
Given the weather in the south is now way cooler and even cold, don’t expect a lot of production there either.
If Colorado doesn’t get enough snow, expect lake mead to drop so low by July of 2023 that the intakes to the turbines will start sucking air, causing cavitation and shutdown.
Would not want to be in the SW USA next summer and fall.
As far as I can see, the circus is based on the assumption that Malone invented mRNA, which is false. The technology was developed in the Soviet Union by 1981, but nobody dared to use it in public, because it would start a chain reaction that could not be controlled:
John I have read all the terrible things that Breggin hurled at Malone. No question that he has gone away too far. Into really irrational things. Malone assembled then on his article! Breggin is a hazard to himself and must be stopped. IMHO.
Saddens me to read of the lawsuit. Understand defamation but I never thought less of either gent just because they disagreed. Neither do I understand the amount. Very sad.
I have read the lawsuit. Have you? What the Breggins, Jane Ruby, et al, have published and publicly stated about Dr. Malone is shockingly defamatory. It is all conjecture and speculation. It appears to me they have taken threads of Dr. Malone's past and woven an outlandish narrative backed by their biases and current worldview. It made me look at the Breggins & Jane Ruby differently. I would have thought they would have a higher level of discernment before publishing such nonsense. Is it jealousy, a delusion or are they just hacks? I'm not defending Dr. Malone as some sort of hero. We have all taken different paths to get to where we are today. Dr. Malone's past in the mainstream medical/scientific complex doesn't make him, according to Breggin, "a supporter of any apologist for political mass murderers. He is not a Hitler apologist and/or a Hitler “excuser”. Breggin claims "Dr. Malone IS Dangerous. I knew from day one, this man is in the middle of every horrific thing that has happened to humanity. He is an operative running interference to keep this thing going" (another of Breggin's multiple off-base claims). I have also read the original letter from Dr. Malone's attorney asking the Breggins to retract their statements, apologize and come to some sort of amiable resolve without having to involve the court system. The Breggins responded by amplifying their public statements. They won't stop. They're obsessed and come off as foolish. So Dr. Malone is demanding a jury trial and the Breggins, Jane Ruby, et al, will have to defend their statements which I think are just baseless opinions that support the narrative of the Breggins' book and the POV of Jane Ruby's podcast.
I have since gone to the Breggins website where they are claiming to be victims. Their newest claim is Dr. Malone is trying to take down Dr. McCullough and Dr. Risch and any other doctor (including themselves) he sees as competition. They took 2 sentences out of a talk Dr. Malone gave where he mentioned Dr. McCullough and Dr. Risch and built a fanciful narrative essay around what that meant and have it currently published on their website. Maybe Breggin has lost it mentally? He comes off as delusional.
Dr. Malone feels he has suffered reputational harm and financial harm by the Breggins, et al. So he is now suing as they won't stop or retract. As far as the $25 million, the lawyer puts that dollar amount into this type of complaint. The lawyer chooses an amount that would be acceptable to the state where the trial will take place. A jury will ultimately decide any financial reward.
If you care to read the complaint this is a link: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/just-the-facts?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=583200&post_id=87613609&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email.
Thank you, as always, for saying what you say. Assigning motivations is difficult, but I stopped reading Malone substack a while ago, as it has gone in direction I find less interesting. The Desmet hypothesis of mass formation is useful and interesting but far from the whole truth. The psychology of societies is something that anyone looking at the covid mania has to somehow take into account. Strange kerfuffle that may make all involved look ugly, and one may get a feeling it is best to just walk away.
Good analysis. Debate is good. Lawsuits, usually bad.
Breggins are good, decent folks.
I'm in camp where I am grateful to both. But drop the lawsuit.
A debate!
Regarding Malone vs. Breggin, I'm not happy to see people who, theoretically, fundamentally agree about the dangers of the jabs fighting each other publicly in court. This only serves to divide those opposed to the jabs.
That said, it is always fair game to criticize Science. That's what Scientists do. They question data, methodology, results and conclusions. They do not further science by attacking Scientists. It is one thing to say, "your conclusions suck", it is quite another to say, "you suck". The first is criticism in the pursuit of scientific truth, the second is ad hominem and is not "science".
Malone is Controlled Opposition. The Pfizer/BioNTech vax was fully approved by the Food and Drug Administration, even though an emergency use authorisation also remains in place. Dr Malone misleadingly said that Americans were only being offered the shot under emergency use authorisation and that it carried different liability ramifications. That makes him controlled op, so no surprise he's suing people really...
"Dr. Malone does not sue those who call him a nut-case-tinfoil-hat-conspiracy-theorist for defamation, but sues Peter Breggin and his wife Ginger Breggin for "defamation" for their message that Malon's take on mass-formation-psychosis tends to let the elite owners, who pump it, off-the-hook."
Check this, Mattias Desmet does does a similar thing in his book 'The Psychology of Totalitarianism' : https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/investigative-reports/covid-19-mass-formation-or-mass-atrocity/
December 1st is here and the sanctions on Russian Oil starts the bite.
Millions of barrels of crude are going “off market” and there will be shortages of unsanctioned oil.
So price hikes are inevitable.
Couple that with the massive cooling going on from stratospheric volcanic ash, 2023 is going to be a very difficult year.
By 2024 the full extent of the damage and food shortages will be global.
Ukraine supplies 40% of the third worlds food supply and most of that will not be planted.
Given the weather in the south is now way cooler and even cold, don’t expect a lot of production there either.
If Colorado doesn’t get enough snow, expect lake mead to drop so low by July of 2023 that the intakes to the turbines will start sucking air, causing cavitation and shutdown.
Would not want to be in the SW USA next summer and fall.
As far as I can see, the circus is based on the assumption that Malone invented mRNA, which is false. The technology was developed in the Soviet Union by 1981, but nobody dared to use it in public, because it would start a chain reaction that could not be controlled:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/mrna
Thank you for reporting this new chapter from the diversion-theater.
mRNA is now used as a red herring that diverts people's attention from the fact that they are slowly being exterminated:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-do-the-perpetrators-protect-themselves
Evil is expanding and seems unstoppable:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-invasion-of-the-infernal-towers
I think these folks are losing their minds! Malone should work on a way to reverse the damage from these injectables!
"Obviously, there are forms of coercion in our world, and those who are experts in their use." John I am not sure what you mean with this sentence.