>> The effects of alumina nanoparticles as fuel additives on the
>> spray characteristics of gas-to-liquid jet fuels.
This article was cited in today's curation without comment. It suggests a new interpretation of chemtrails.
My position has been that visual evidence of chemtrails is undeniable, but the cost of a transnational program spraying the skies must be enormous and the purpose mysterious. As a strategy for increasing the earth's albedo, it seems wasteful and unnecessary. As a means to kill humans or pollute farmland, it is monumentally inefficient.
The cited article (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0894177717301309) says that adding aluminum nanoparticles to jet fuel helps the fuel to burn more efficiently. This raises the possibility that chemtrails are a toxic side-effect of an innovation in jet propulsion.
The observation of chemtrails goes back to the mid 1990s, at least for me in Austin, Texas, whereas the research papers I have looked up in the past few years are almost all much more recent. This was just one I quickly looked up to make the point that aluminum added to jet fuel is a proven thing that works just fine, so nozzles are no longer needed. I don't know about other things like barium and fibers. I don't think they would work out efficiently like nano-aluminum as a fuel-enhancing additive.
Again, intention is not so discernible, but technology is clearly there to facilitate aluminum oxide chemtrails coming from the gas pump.
I have wondered if the tanks used at takeoff might be different from the tanks used at cruising, but that is only a thought. I have not been able to find any technical data to that effect.
Aluminum nanoparticles can't be cheaper than standard jet fuel; even the Fischer-Tropsch sort. I would posit for weather control. Mere albedo is rather blunt, so barium must also be added as needed. How is that done? Nano soap scum? (Aka, nano barium napalm)
However when considering the issue of "profiteering from the mountains of fluoride waste to "improve" dental health", it isn't difficult to predict how every (deeply compromised) US regime will treat the goyim - the most recent (probably not last) of the infamous cases was the "safe & effective" biowarfare shot.
Just an uninformed thought: Would any unburned nano aluminum help some of the now intense wildfires reach the new levels of intensity? Aluminum does burn hot and if in nano sized coatings on everything under major flight paths? A small pile of redneck thermite, 8 parts iron oxide 3 parts aluminum, set alight with a sparkler burns right through steel. Don't watch without welding glasses.
You can rest assured that in the atmosphere, only oxidized nano-Al can exist. Al oxidizes very fast and every object thought to be Al, is covered with a thin layer of aluminum oxide (Al2O3).
It's the reason why thermite needs a high temperature to start the reaction (melt the Al so the oxide layer no longer matters).
My god, if Trump really wants to end the war in Ukraine, cut off all funding and start threatening any country who does fund the war with sanctions and tariffs. It'll end in less than a month, maybe a week.
The global oil price may see a sharp rise in the coming days/weeks. This might drive it up 20+ US$. I guess we'll soon see if the Houthi"s follow through and disable or sink a couple of tankers.
>> The effects of alumina nanoparticles as fuel additives on the
>> spray characteristics of gas-to-liquid jet fuels.
This article was cited in today's curation without comment. It suggests a new interpretation of chemtrails.
My position has been that visual evidence of chemtrails is undeniable, but the cost of a transnational program spraying the skies must be enormous and the purpose mysterious. As a strategy for increasing the earth's albedo, it seems wasteful and unnecessary. As a means to kill humans or pollute farmland, it is monumentally inefficient.
The cited article (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0894177717301309) says that adding aluminum nanoparticles to jet fuel helps the fuel to burn more efficiently. This raises the possibility that chemtrails are a toxic side-effect of an innovation in jet propulsion.
The observation of chemtrails goes back to the mid 1990s, at least for me in Austin, Texas, whereas the research papers I have looked up in the past few years are almost all much more recent. This was just one I quickly looked up to make the point that aluminum added to jet fuel is a proven thing that works just fine, so nozzles are no longer needed. I don't know about other things like barium and fibers. I don't think they would work out efficiently like nano-aluminum as a fuel-enhancing additive.
Again, intention is not so discernible, but technology is clearly there to facilitate aluminum oxide chemtrails coming from the gas pump.
I have wondered if the tanks used at takeoff might be different from the tanks used at cruising, but that is only a thought. I have not been able to find any technical data to that effect.
Aluminum nanoparticles can't be cheaper than standard jet fuel; even the Fischer-Tropsch sort. I would posit for weather control. Mere albedo is rather blunt, so barium must also be added as needed. How is that done? Nano soap scum? (Aka, nano barium napalm)
I don't have the information needed to answer your question.
We can see things happening, but can only find little bits of the puzzle as we try to understand WHY and exactly-how it is happening.
The first time I read a more or less official article on chemtrails was in 2015:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26270671/
(retracted)
That wasn't the complete article:
https://geoengineeringwatch.org/new-science-study-confirms-contamination-from-climate-engineering-assault/
However when considering the issue of "profiteering from the mountains of fluoride waste to "improve" dental health", it isn't difficult to predict how every (deeply compromised) US regime will treat the goyim - the most recent (probably not last) of the infamous cases was the "safe & effective" biowarfare shot.
Just an uninformed thought: Would any unburned nano aluminum help some of the now intense wildfires reach the new levels of intensity? Aluminum does burn hot and if in nano sized coatings on everything under major flight paths? A small pile of redneck thermite, 8 parts iron oxide 3 parts aluminum, set alight with a sparkler burns right through steel. Don't watch without welding glasses.
You can rest assured that in the atmosphere, only oxidized nano-Al can exist. Al oxidizes very fast and every object thought to be Al, is covered with a thin layer of aluminum oxide (Al2O3).
It's the reason why thermite needs a high temperature to start the reaction (melt the Al so the oxide layer no longer matters).
It is hard to imagine nano aluminum not getting burned in a jet engine...
My god, if Trump really wants to end the war in Ukraine, cut off all funding and start threatening any country who does fund the war with sanctions and tariffs. It'll end in less than a month, maybe a week.
The global oil price may see a sharp rise in the coming days/weeks. This might drive it up 20+ US$. I guess we'll soon see if the Houthi"s follow through and disable or sink a couple of tankers.
Thanks to Doc R over at TAE yesterday.
https://en.mehrnews.com/news/231359/Yemen-bans-US-crude-oil-exports-through-Red-Sea
That is a ban on US oil going from the US through the Red Sea. That's interesting.
I am not sure how much does that, and the best I can tell, the answer is "none".
That's an interesting political move, maybe meant for the folks at home.