Pondering Solutions, Gail Tverberg, Why financial approaches won’t fix the world’s economic problems this time [There is a lot of focus upon energy-poor Europe.] The issue is a physics problem. The economy doesn’t run simply on money and debt.
Thank you, such good writing and reasearch, as always.
I notice I want to feel/grope somehow into the spirit/non-material side of what is going on. Insulating oneself from consequences of choices&actions is an upper and middle-class dream. Without pension you live on the love/cohesion/charity of others, or your own savings, if you can keep them. What we have now is extremely fragile. And a lot of the fragility comes from pension funds. Health seems to be somewhat similar - vaccinating may prevent this, but can cause that. Cost-benefit is hard to do. How long will it take that vaccine as a brand of miraculous disease-eradicator is sucked empty by the vultures? Those vultures: they will be around when there is pickings, be it fat, slow-moving pension-fund whales or juicy slow-moving science-brand whales.
Embracing consequences to the full - that is the end of consuming, I'd say. But blaming and avenging is where we're at now and it continues until the energy of those emotions and the fuels they need run dry. Or a miracle happens. Like folks running the exploitation engine just walk away. Or get sick.
A proud holobiont hobbit: no antibiotics at least 15 years, maybe 20.
It says that "HIV is the causative agent of AIDS". Montagnier didn't think so (only for a short amount of time early on). Duesberg neither. I don't know the answer.
Vaccines ... "cause more harms than benefits" says it all. The scum pHARMa and their lackey helpers, the FDA and CDC, do not want such studies to ever see the light of day. One day, pitch forks and torches...
If you are still pondering something to worry about as in your last post:
I heard BU's COVID 2.0 gain of function tested five mice. What if the sole survivor was given a prior vaccine/antidote and the kill rate is closer to 100.0%? Naawww, They would Never do That! Can you imagine a faster solution to global climate change and resource depletion with less collateral damage? Fortunately, They probably can't do that . . . yet.
The only thing that would help is a change of system.
That will not be allowed because the current system serves the powers in power that want to stay in power.
They stay in power through a sophisticated system of Mind control.
We have the Technology to change.
In fact i go this far to say that the powers in charge hold Humanity back.
Without them I declare we can enter a new Golden Age for Humanity within a decade.
It is this sophisticated system of Mind Control that stands in our way.
Godspeed
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/planetary-mind-control-religion-and
Thank you, such good writing and reasearch, as always.
I notice I want to feel/grope somehow into the spirit/non-material side of what is going on. Insulating oneself from consequences of choices&actions is an upper and middle-class dream. Without pension you live on the love/cohesion/charity of others, or your own savings, if you can keep them. What we have now is extremely fragile. And a lot of the fragility comes from pension funds. Health seems to be somewhat similar - vaccinating may prevent this, but can cause that. Cost-benefit is hard to do. How long will it take that vaccine as a brand of miraculous disease-eradicator is sucked empty by the vultures? Those vultures: they will be around when there is pickings, be it fat, slow-moving pension-fund whales or juicy slow-moving science-brand whales.
Embracing consequences to the full - that is the end of consuming, I'd say. But blaming and avenging is where we're at now and it continues until the energy of those emotions and the fuels they need run dry. Or a miracle happens. Like folks running the exploitation engine just walk away. Or get sick.
A proud holobiont hobbit: no antibiotics at least 15 years, maybe 20.
I was sickened by that tetanus shot, lasted for years, I never thought to blame that injection for the weakness it caused.
It says that "HIV is the causative agent of AIDS". Montagnier didn't think so (only for a short amount of time early on). Duesberg neither. I don't know the answer.
Vaccines ... "cause more harms than benefits" says it all. The scum pHARMa and their lackey helpers, the FDA and CDC, do not want such studies to ever see the light of day. One day, pitch forks and torches...
Your homestead looks quite fine. :)
If you are still pondering something to worry about as in your last post:
I heard BU's COVID 2.0 gain of function tested five mice. What if the sole survivor was given a prior vaccine/antidote and the kill rate is closer to 100.0%? Naawww, They would Never do That! Can you imagine a faster solution to global climate change and resource depletion with less collateral damage? Fortunately, They probably can't do that . . . yet.
well said