Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kalle Pihlajasaari's avatar

I am nervous about war reparations that Russia may demand from the foolish countries that sent military aid to the Ukraine.

Finland got into bed with the Nazis WWII against Russia. The Russians did not let them forget.

Expand full comment
Mike Hampton's avatar

I wrote an article last week which included this quote from French General Yakovleff:

"NATO's job is, for the next 20 years, to sort out chaos in Europe. And what is it doing? Discussing F16s or F35s or ammunition of a given type.

When Ukraine will eventually become a member of NATO, it will be a completely different member of NATO.

Of the 31 members today, half started their career as partners of NATO, and they entered NATO as supplicants, with both hands up towards the sky, saying 'Please take me and I will behave'.

With Ukraine, it will be completely different. They will become a member of NATO, one day, and they will say 'We are entitled to be a member of NATO. We have done NATO's war! No one else has done NATO's war. We have the strongest military in Europe, the most competent military in Europe. You're the ones who are going to take lessons from us.'

So, I call for Ukraine, as soon as possible, to become a member of NATO, but NATO must stop this myopic view...

What the Ukrainians say is that they want security guarantees in case of resumption of conflict. That's their words, heard in Kiev last week. And what's interesting is that 'resumption' means cessation. There's no notion of resumption if there hasn't been a cessation. So the question becomes, what does Ukraine call an acceptable cessation of conflict? And that is their issue, is their call. It's not NATO's.

So NATO's there waiting for Ukraine to decide, and then, in case of resumption, we will discuss Article 5, where does it apply and so on.

But NATO's going into a discussion, a summit to discuss what they going to do after tomorrow. I can't believe it."

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts